Gene Tunney vs. Michael Spinks

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Loewe, Sep 12, 2008.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,801
    29,237
    Jun 2, 2006
    Slattery was a clever hands down by your sides boxer I would't call him a puncher .Tunney did beat Carpentier who had 57 kos in 88 wins,many of them over heavyweights.
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Sorry Loewe, after the post i made here, i havent been on the internet for a few days, been busy.

    I dont know who would have the clear edge in a chess match, not sure there would be such an edge actually. I always think that Tunney is much more rugged than people generally think, in today's era, this can be seen on some footage. I think Tunney would likely be the aggressor, as Spinks would be trying to box and use that hand speed, Tunney can win this imo, but he may need to land a big punch and follow up on it, which he can do, he was very persistent when going after his man, with the left-right one-two. I just take Spinks to edge him, with that awkward movement and fast hands nicking it, might be wrong though.
     
  3. COULDHAVEBEEN

    COULDHAVEBEEN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,776
    16
    Jul 10, 2007
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,672
    2,167
    Aug 26, 2004
    I like Tunney here by a UD, Gene was faster of hand and foot and had a good punch as well, had good recupritive power...Michael was a rugged lightheavy, tough but I see Gene winning it with a busier workrate
     
  6. COULDHAVEBEEN

    COULDHAVEBEEN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,776
    16
    Jul 10, 2007
    You promoted this match-up Loewe. Haven't seen your view of the outcome yet!
     
  7. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Well, I think Tunney has the slight edge in power and a bigger edge in ring generalship that would decide the outcome of that fight. They are very close so in a fight very little could make the difference. In a three fight series I would expect Tunney to win two and Spinks to win 1.
     
  8. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    I think Michael edges Gene in fights at both weights, probably a stronger advantage for him at light heavyweight, where he fought in one of the most talent-ladden divisions in the history of light heavyweight.And he has Eddie Futch in his corner, major advantage.
     
  9. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,379
    15,509
    Jun 9, 2007
    Tunney,any way you slice it.
     
  10. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    spinks at 175

    tunney at heavy
     
  11. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Funny enough, if not for a long count who knows if this vaunted Tunney would've won the fight let alone finished the fight eh?
     
  12. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    tunney got up in time. that's all that matters. there is no more reason to think otherwise than to think that douglas was counted out against tyson