Gene Tunney Vs Walcott, Charles, and Moore

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Balder, Jul 27, 2015.


  1. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012
    Would Tunney be favored over them?

    These would be the versions Marciano fought.
     
  2. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Prime Tunney beats all three. The greatest pure boxer we have ever had as hwt champion.
     
  3. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012
    I would agree.


    I think Charles gives him fits though. I think a safe be is Gene wins 2 out of the 3, But I would favor him all three fights, and definitely any rematch.
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    I think Charles has the best chance but Genes movement allows him to outbox Charles over 15 rounds.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,723
    29,072
    Jun 2, 2006
    I would pick him.
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Of course Tunney won 19 out of 20 rounds against Dempsey. Dempsey just couldn't break down or take out skilled boxers
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Prime Tunney beats any version Walcott and Moore.

    Prime Tunney v prime Charles is 50-50.
    But with the Charles of 1954, Tunney wins.

    3-0 Tunney
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,723
    29,072
    Jun 2, 2006
    How about we take Marciano out of the ring for 3 years ,feed him a steady diet of Holywood starlets and good times.Have him acrimoniously split with his long term manager, face several lawsuits from him , then come back and face a prime motivated Gene Tunney? How does that sound to you?:think
     
  9. FreshPrince

    FreshPrince Member Full Member

    146
    13
    May 12, 2015
    Great fights. I agree with the consensus. Tunney beats them all, but it won't be easy, of course.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Poor Jack, full of excuses, like always
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,437
    Jun 25, 2014
    Gene Tunney held his hands very low - about chest high - and threw a lot of jabs and straight rights. In a lot of ways he fought like the younger Vitali Klitscho, except Vitali could get away with holding his hands so low because he was so tall while Gene had better footwork.

    I think Walcott, Charles and Moore would have very little problem landing on Tunney. I'd give them all a great chance at beating him. I think Moore - who had more KOs than anyone including over a lot of heavyweights - might even stop him.

    Dempsey didn't fight like any of those guys. Neither did Georges Carpentier. Walcott and Tommy Gibbons kind of fought similarly, but Walcot was a lot bigger and stronger.

    Tunney might have the best chance against Jersey Joe. Sometimes Joe would telegraph his punches and his defense wasn't great.

    But I'd favor all the 50s guys over Tunney. Not by a lot, but I would.
     
  12. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Couldn't agree more, I think JJW and Charles beats.. I think he takes Archie though
     
  13. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,237
    15,278
    Jun 9, 2007
    Dempsey was also a shell of his former self.
     
  14. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,237
    15,278
    Jun 9, 2007
    Dempsey in his prime beats every guy mentioned in this thread.
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Then why didn't he prove it by beating elite opponents?