Gene Tunney was an awful fighter

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Oct 30, 2007.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    15,996
    Jul 19, 2004
    :rofl
     
  2. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    11,381
    17,195
    Jul 2, 2006
    yeah a calzaghe fan criticising Tunney on punching technique :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,243
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that was the case around 1920.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,243
    Feb 15, 2006
    As you say it dosnt do to generalize. Joe Gans might have developed boxing technique as far as it could practicaly go even if he was not representative.

    On the other hand you have people who continued to use the old school methods right up to the 1950s often with considerable sucess. Charley Burley for example was in many ways in the mould of Jim Corbett and Bob Fitzsimmons.
     
  5. Greg T Loepp

    Greg T Loepp New Member Full Member

    40
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    I have many things over the years about the fighting Marine, but never that he was an awful fighter...thats just plain antogonstic. Gene was a brilliant tactician, a superior boxer/puncher, conditioning second only to Marciano, and could take one heck of a whallop.
     
  6. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    The sport stopped evolving around the sonny liston era, hes considered as the first modern day heavyweight great. I would pick sonny to beat all of those guys before him.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,243
    Feb 15, 2006
    But Liston did not bring anything new.

    There were heavyweights with better technique before him and bigger heavyweights before him.
     
  8. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    But not his combination of size and power, along with that sexy jab. Admit it janitor, his jab has to turn you on.
     
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    More historical revisionism!!!!! No, make that HYSTERICAL REVISIONISM!!!! All of a sudden, a great fighter becomes an "awful fighter"! I agree with the previous posters, that Tunney was a great fighter, good enough to school Jack Dempsey twice, but wait, by your logic, Dempsey was a bum!!! Right? Hey it's fun being a hysterical revisionist, why you can make up any crap you want! Like, if it came before the eighties, it's gotta be crap, right? Or, if you like, Muhammad Ali, Roy Jones and Baby Floyd Boy are the greatest of all. Yeah, that's the ticket!!
     
  10. Langford

    Langford Active Member Full Member

    830
    3
    Jul 22, 2004
    everyone is horrible. Especially the fighters from past eras who were too stupid not to be born now, but especially these modern day PPV sissy boys who refuse to fight each other. They are all terrible.

    And you know whats really terrible? All athletes, God, I hate them.
     
  11. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    A great boxer and an underrated KO artist, people forget he knocked out only 3 less fighters than Dempsey
     
  12. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    Tunney had fast hands and feet, proberly the fastest hands until Patterson and the Fastest feet until Ali, he also took a good shot and recovered well when hurt and had good power for a guy on the move. Tunney is underated
     
  13. Arminius

    Arminius Member Full Member

    482
    17
    Sep 5, 2006
    Absolutely true. Beautiful jab, terrific power at times (much like Ali showed) and studied the opponent like few before him.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Your last sentence says it all! Gene Tunney is the most persistantly and consistantly the most underrated and underappreciated of all past heavyweight champions. I've seen posts that actually OVERRATE guys like Primo Carnera and Gene Tunney is called an "awful fighter". Back in the late seventies on one of the greatest of all boxing friendly tv programs, Wide World of Sports, Muhammad Ali was interviewed during an extended viewing of some rare and not so rare footage of the greatest heavyweight champions of all time and how, in the opinions of Ali and Howard Cosell, who was there with Ali. Dempsey, Louis, Baer, Charles, Johnson, Marciano, etc., were all candidly assessed and evaluated by the two of them, with of course, Ali seeing himself winning against all of them. In the mix was Gene Tunney, whom Ali deemed as the most sophisticated, and most like a "modern fighter". Tunney was still alive at the time, and who knows, may have even seen the show and heard Ali's complimentary views and opinion of him. Ali frankly thought that Tunney would have been one of the easist for him to beat, since the Fighting Marine was too much of an orthodox, pure boxer, which incidently, I agree with, but Ali had high praise for Tunney and again, remarked as to how modern looking, and sophisticated and polished Tunney was. Tunney was a brilliant boxer, a "textbook" boxer, to be sure, but a studied, tough as nails early practitioner of scientific boxing who would be far too smart and disciplined for most fighters he would meet in any era you can name.
     
  15. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    The interview, and the viewing of the films was at Ali's Deer Lake training camp, and this episode, probably from 1976 or '77, would be a treasure on unearth, as I remember it was Ali, making frank, candid and lucid commentary about the great champions of the past that made it so interesting and enjoyable. Does anybody else remember seeing this episode?