Gennady Golovkin vs. Carl Froch @ 168.

You started quoting my posts you weird little Troll, don't like my posts, don't read them. I don't give a ****, go quote somebody else's posts, I'm sure they will oblige you with some decent bait, you're seeking on these forums. Anybody says anything differing from your train of thought you try to shut it down because you must be right, awwww. Sorry to hurt your feelings, sweety. xox

 

Froch ducked PRIME ELITE Edison Miranda! Who lost to PRIME ELITE Chilemba! Who lost to WEIGHT DRAINED Bellew! Which means PRIME ELITE FAT CRUISERWEIGHT Bellew is easily better than any version of Froch that ever lived! Wait, what the deuce does this have to do with Golovkin again?

 

What hatred?

Where's the hatred?

I'm a GG fan myself.

Disagreeing with you isn't us hating on him.

 

It you think he's anything less than an A fighter and an ATG, it's hating. This is the MO I've observed.

 

How is it the same?

Everyone's circumstances are different.

 

Prime Kessler(Not the one who faced Froch in their first fight) would beat GGG, and that prime Kessler would beat Froch easier than the slightly faded version. You seem to think Kessler was still prime when he first fought Carl Froch, I'm just correcting you on that train of thought, because he wasn't.

Ward, GGG, Joe all "ELITE", yeah, they beat Froch easy. If you don't think GGG is on Joe or Ward's level, that's a shame, because I do.

 

The only guy here throwing around expletives (impotently, I might add, since the filter catches them) and tedious insults is you. You've been incapable of formulating a coherent argument or posting without cussing and catcalling since the early stages of your tenure in this thread.

If I resort to a little mild satire for fun, who could blame me? You're thoroughly obnoxious and unintelligible.

 

Now, the Alt is calling his BS, "Satire" because you, yourself haven't given us a reason why Froch beats GGG, only one of them has been knocked down before, and only one of them has been knocked out before. I've stated my reasons...
* More accurate
* better footwork
* IQ
* range
* CHIN(GGG's never been knocked down before, Carl has)
* Froch is useless against BOXERS(Taylor, GG, Ward, AD) all were beating him. GGG is an ELITE boxer. Degale would have made him look foolish as well.

 

^ I'm too long in the tooth to take you seriously at this point, guy, give me a damn break over here.

 

GGG is P4P number 1 for some reason, he would have been tied with Ward if Atlas did his judging fairly, GGG has spent more time on the P4P list than Ward has. Hmmmm...

 

Is this getting to you, are you in waaaay over your head here? I don't see your debates as to why Froch beats GGG, you probably have Froch beating GGG easily, don't you? You Gdamn hypocrite.

 

You're delusional, but the rhetorical frenzy with which you defend your ludicrous positions is quite delightful.

 

Yeah, that's because you don't read properly, you just scan and then wildly garble a bunch of thoughtless caca into your textbox before hitting submit as fast as you can. If you did read attentively, you'd have encountered them already. Mind you, at this point, you'd have to wade through about ninety pages of your own verbal manure to get to my missives on the matchup. Seems like a lifetime ago that I posted them.

 

The only thing "delightful" here is your backtracking, you asked for a debate, you have yet to give me your own reasoning for Carl Froch beating GGG at 168lbs. I'd love to hear it, gimme a detailed breakdown of the entire fight if you want, I want to see what you believe in...