Gennady Golovkin vs Dick Tiger

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SHADAPBLAD, Aug 18, 2018.


  1. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    I see the 1950's brigade is out in force :lol: Yeah, ok guys, they "don't make em like they used to" like they were in "the good old days". It's kind of pointless going on because my references to actual footage are no match for the much-grimed and rose-tinted spectacles that see "ye olde champions" in a special light. Those were the days when a guy with a record of 62-30 was a killer because "they was all ol' school proper 'ard men back then".

    Man Machine, your last post excepted.

    Later fellas, and don't forget the prune juice or tomorrow morning is going to be tough ;)
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yeah leaving is better than answering the questions isn't it?
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    I answered the questions but some can't hear the answers.

    http://www.earinstitute.co.za/hearing-aids/

    "When you struggle to hear, your ability to communicate effectively is compromised, and it can become difficult to enjoy participating in daily activities such as outings with friends, parties, business meetings or family gatherings. It can also become challenging to talk on the phone, or listen to the television at a normal level or understand basic logic even when it's demonstrated step by step to you. This is tragic."
     
  4. SHADAPBLAD

    SHADAPBLAD Viscous Knockouts Full Member

    1,143
    1,279
    Feb 15, 2017
    This isnt old school vs new school. This is Tiger vs Golovkin. Not even talking about their resumes, Tiger simply looks better than Golovkin, against better opposition. Its amazing you have anything to say about Tiger covering up and taking shots from Fullmer, a proven top 30 middleweight ATG with an ugly and effective offensive arsenal, when Golovkins best defense consists of putting his hands near his face and looking down at the floor. And this is against middling talent that will be forgotten in a year. Hell, Jacobs is already forgotten after his last fight.
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    https://www.specsavers.co.za/

    :thinking: LOOOOOOK ATTT THE FOOOOOTTTTAAAGGGEEEE!!!!

    This content is protected


    LOOOOOOK ATTT THE FOOOOOTTTTAAAGGGEEEE!!!!
     
  6. SHADAPBLAD

    SHADAPBLAD Viscous Knockouts Full Member

    1,143
    1,279
    Feb 15, 2017
    By best I mean his defense against his best opponents. Listen bud, Golovkin isnt a pretty boxer. Gene Fullmer could look like Lomachenko if he was in there with David Lemieux. He would not if he was fighting Henry Hank. I doubt Golovkin would, either
     
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    I really think this thread has come to its conclusion, for me at least.

    I've made my case, I think it was a good case ... some agree, most don't, and that's ok.

    We aren't covering any new ground now.

    :)
     
    SHADAPBLAD likes this.
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Henry Hank? Sure, he lost THRITY Times, and drew FOUR times.

    Forgiving his first ten pro fights, Henry Hank lost to journeyman and trial horses, hardly close to ability to say Jacobs, or Canelo in ability!

    Just a few samples:

    Harvey 9-2-2 beat Hank!
    Akins 24-13 beat Hank!
    Walker, only 2-1 beat Hank!
    Triplett 22-5-4 beat Hank!
    Wallace 27-13 -1 beat Hank!
    C. Cotton 39-11-1 beat Hank!
    Burford 16-4 beat Hank!
    Joseph 52 -10 -1 beat Hank!
    Mims 48-19-6 beat Hank
    Casey 24-2-5 beat Hank
    G Armstrong 18- 2- 1 beat Hank

    These guys are JOURNEYMAN. Some were older or inexperienced when Henry Hank fought them. How many of these losses were top ten fighters that Hank lost to? What?!

    I checked the annual ratings, Henry Hank only appeared at middle for two years at #5 in 1960, and 1961. That is it, he does not appear as a middle from 1953-1959. GGG would beat him easily and judging by the numerous losses and draws, some of which I did not even bother to mention, he's losing to many of GGG's opponents too.

    So Dick Tiger beat him vey easily and Dick Tiger himself lost a lot. As soon as Tiger beat Hank, he was out of the middle weigh rankings. When Hank moved up to light weight, he lost more than he won.

    This is laughable! Sorry guys, my guess is you haven't seen much on Hank on video, and can't examine a ring record. Once again, and elite level fighter should seldom lost to journeyman. No 48-19-6, 50 years ago is NOT a better fighter 49-1-2 ( Alvarez) ) or 34-2 ( Jacobs ) today.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    I'm not sure f you really think so, or are just upset with the way we are examining ring records.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  10. SHADAPBLAD

    SHADAPBLAD Viscous Knockouts Full Member

    1,143
    1,279
    Feb 15, 2017
    I can see Holly Mims beating Golovkin
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Henry Hank beat
    Sixto Rodriguez
    Chic Calderwood
    George Benton
    Jesse Bowdry
    Holly Mims
    Joey Giardello

    Who has Jacobs beaten to match that?

    This content is protected

    ps I grew up watching Hank on the Saturday fights with guys like Tiger,Mina,Giardello.You're talking out of your arse and judging him from Box Rec!
     
    young griffo likes this.
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    I'm not upset about it, I know my own criteria. I'm just saying you yourself should know better.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    My questions to you are, who on Golovkin's record is a top twenty all time middle weight?
    Who on Jacobs record is as good as
    Benton
    Mims
    Giardello
    ????

    Going to dissapear again?lol
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
  14. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    Wow you really are having a hard time understanding ANYthing, aren't you?

    Were those guys regarded as "top 20" all time middleweights at the time they were fighting? I'll bet dollars to donuts they were not. A fighter's standing only becomes apparent at the end of a long career, or years after he retires.

    For the record, Jacobs would absolutely eat little 5'7 Holley Mims alive.

    Here's Mims in action:

    This content is protected


    McVey will now point out all the SECRET and LOST techniques of "them ole days" for us kids. He will show just how special a fighter Mims was. Convince us. Take it away, McVey.
     
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,951
    Aug 21, 2012
    Meanwhile here's Jacobs showing how it's done:

    This content is protected