Gennady Golovkin vs Dick Tiger

Got those names I requested a couple of posts ago, or will you pretend you didnt see my post?lol
Just to refresh you "selective memory"

Q. Hank beat George Benton who exactly has Jacobs beaten who was that good?

 

Still awaiting your answer Mendoza!

 

I feel Jacob's getting overrated here. G from a few yrs ago stops him.
Befor he stopped Kid Chocolate no one was talking about Jacob's. Chocolate proved to be a big bust.
Remember when Pirog destroyed Jacob's. That's what younger G would have done.
Forget the Canelo BS we all have eyes G won that 8-4 and Canelo has been the larger man for the last 4 years adleast.

 

A: If Jacobs fought all of Hank's people, he'd lose a lot less than Hank did. Hank just got lots of chances. More often then not he lost to the best. A vast difference however is Jacobs never lost to the level of fighters Hank did numerous times.

Can you show me Hank's record vs top ten fighters, when he fought them? I can ask again if needed : )

Jacobs has a win over Qulllin, who was ranked as high a #2, and close lost to GGG, who was ranked #1. I'd say Jacobs has a better winning percentage in the top ten.

 

Priog was 20-0, 15 Ko's and looked like a force.

His career was cut short ( 2012 ) due to a debilitating back injury, he is one of the few professional boxers to win a world title and retire undefeated.

 

Pirog was 16-0 (13 KOs), at the time he fought Jacobs.
The title was a bit of a set up, really. A WBO strap, which had been stripped from Martinez.

 

hey Mendy.

Jacobs is just a good contender.

The reason he stands out on GGG's resume is that its the first time GGG fought the top contender, 3G was 34 i think.

 

Let's hope Golovkin can be emphatic in his conquest of the Giant Canelo, next time then; perhaps, inspiring a renaissance in epic poetry (accompanied by lute)...

 

How about you answer the question,namely who on Jacobs record is as good as George Benton?

Waiting I'll ask again if you dodge the question again!

Also I'm still waiting for a reply to my other question namely.
So for those 6 years Mims was a top ten ranked middleweight the competition was inferior to today's, is that what you are saying?That :
Webb
Downes
Giardello
Tiger
Calhoun
Olson
Humez
Langlois
Basilio
Castellani
Fernandez
Turner
Fullmer
Robinson
Are inferior to todays top ten ie


Alvarez
Golovkin
Jacobs
Saunders
Derevyanchenko
Charlo
Murata
Andrade
Lemieux
N'Dam
O Sullivan

Yeah right ! Care to tell us what the bottom 8s best wins are?

 

No dodge, you are comparing an active 31 year old boxer ( Jacobs ) to a finished product. You have to say Benton's record is better now, however he lost a lot too, and that doesn't mean those who beat him were better than Jacobs. I think that reasoning is tough for you to grasp.

Now, can you tell me Hank's record vs. the top ten opponents when they were ranked? Its not a hard question. This is the 2nd time I am asking.

 

Yes,I'll be glad too just as soon as you answer my other question.

So for those 6 years Mims was a top ten ranked middleweight the competition was inferior to today's, is that what you are saying?That :
Webb
Downes
Giardello
Tiger
Calhoun
Olson
Humez
Langlois
Basilio
Castellani
Fernandez
Turner
Fullmer
Robinson
Are inferior to todays top ten ie


Alvarez
Golovkin
Jacobs
Saunders
Derevyanchenko
Charlo
Murata
Andrade
Lemieux
N'Dam
O Sullivan

Yeah right ! Care to tell us what the bottom 8s best wins are

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

I think the problem is your unfamiliar with the fighters.

For example Billy Joe Saunders is very mobile and fast. Undefeated and an Olympic gold champion. Hank, short with no power. I'd take Saunders here.

Derevyanchenko is very impressive. He fights Jacobs next.

Charlo. a big puncher.

No need to remind you on what you are unfamiliar with, except to say none of the above fighters lost multiple times to as Hank did.