George Foreman (1991) -vs- David Tua (1998)…

It did not take me any effort at all to find your rabid posts and it isn't something I took a whole lot of "pride" in.

I'm bright enough to see that you are ducking the conversation because you're butthurt and triggered about Foreman. You know it, I know it, and you know than I know it deep down now.

I answered your disingenuous question. You're upset because I saw through your pathetic strategy.

 

Every word I uttered is relevant to the debate.

You think Foreman is overrated. I think Foreman is the GOAT. There is the disagreement.

 

Can you point to a time where he ever has? Even once?

 

No - and, as far as ranting irrelevancy goes, that last effort is a championship contender.

 

It's actually quite impressive and hilarious how condescending and smug he gets after typing multiple paragraphs without making a single valid point or rebuttal.

With some posters, it's as if they're talking to themselves and then patting themselves on the back regardless of the outcome of the exchange. I call them "shadow-boxers".

 

Indeed - A sure sign of an agenda, rooted in emotion.

Oh yes, a few of those spring to mind and it's weird, because this is akin to Troll-like behavior.