George Foreman v Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Oct 28, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,407
    48,815
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: is this a post about the bodies of fighters you think were out of shape?!
     
  2. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009

    I'll give you Frazier, he certainly awsn't a very good athlete, but he was still in good shape when he was in his peak.
    Marciano certainly was always in good shape though. There's no doubt about that.
    Same with Bowe. Bowe of the Holyfield fight was in top shape.
    How can you say Holmes had a feminine shape.
    To me, thats bull****.
    http://www.thesweetscience.com/images/15434/Larry Holmes vs Ken Norton.jpg
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,544
    47,762
    Feb 11, 2005
    It's a response to someone who was denigrating Jess Willard because he didn't look like Superman. My point is to illustrate that many great heavies haven't looked like Adonis yet were great fighters and in turn, great athletes. Don't believe the eye test. It's gay.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  4. :patsch
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Are people seriously comparing Foreman to Willard? I mean seriously?
     
  6. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    which people ??
     
  7. :good FOREMAN WAS ABSOLUTELY SUPERIOR TO WILLARD. BETTER BOXER, BETTER JAB,STRONGER,HARDER PUNCHER,HE HAD BETTER CHIN.
    WILLARD WAS JUST TALLER.

    BUT JOE FRAZIER WAS BETTER THAN JACK DEMPSEY, MORE COMPACT,STRONGER AND HEAVIER. HE WAS BETTER PRESSURING, HE HAD MORE STAMINA AND MORE HEART
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    :good
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,656
    9,748
    Jul 15, 2008
    If Bentonmade that comment he must have said it befoe the 80's ... Frazier was an Adonis compared to the Tubbs/Page/Witherspoon gang ..if cuts made champs , Tom Sharkey, Cleveland Willams and Ken Norton would have been all time greats ..
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  10. Johnstown

    Johnstown Boxing Addict banned

    5,695
    12
    Aug 30, 2010
    dont really know about stronger...by all reports dempsey was strong....

    he was heavier..but it was basically fat..if you actually look at the tale of the tape on the guys....dempsey is the biger man.


    more heart? i dont know? how do we decide that....its not like dempsey was tyson who quit in fights or anything...

    more stainma....ummmm....
    he was "better" at pressuring in the sense that he did it all the time..becasue that is al he could do. Dempsey was able to stay back and take a look at who he was fighting....

    i will say foreman is definitly better then willard in most every way..maybe not jab though..young foreman didnt really use his jab all that well.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,544
    47,762
    Feb 11, 2005
    No, people are not. If the post intrigues you, read back in the thread to find the context and what it was referring to. Sorry to be a ***** but it would save a lot of misunderstanding.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,544
    47,762
    Feb 11, 2005
    Frank Bruno would still be champ! That dude should have gone straight to bodybuilding.
     
  13. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    big george busted ron lyle up with his left jab but as you say he didn't use it enough
     
  14.  
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,350
    45,534
    Apr 27, 2005
    Foreman via slaughter.