George Foreman vs Jerry Quarry

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Dynamicpuncher, Feb 15, 2022.


  1. SwarmingSlugger

    SwarmingSlugger Active Member Full Member

    1,349
    1,663
    Nov 27, 2010
    Indeed Chinny Kenny was not the best.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  2. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,957
    853
    Nov 23, 2007
    George hurts him
     
  3. ronnyrains

    ronnyrains Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    840
    May 27, 2014
    Countering Tommy Morrison, but this would not be in the same timeframe
     
  4. ronnyrains

    ronnyrains Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    840
    May 27, 2014
    watch Quarry against Frazier in 1969. or mac foster 1970, lyle or shavers, or for that matter Patterson or Spencer, and tell me how slow he was?
     
    Curtis Lowe likes this.
  5. ronnyrains

    ronnyrains Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    840
    May 27, 2014
    Jerry was just so confident and he knew Foreman's ring style well.
     
    ETM likes this.
  6. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,449
    7,050
    Nov 17, 2021
    Quarry would definitely like Foreman's style in a broader sense (puncher/slugger), as he was an accomplished counterpuncher with great lateral movement and strength of mind required to deconstruct big hitters without letting the pressure get to you.

    It's the details that damn him though.

    The big punchers he took out were nowhere near Foreman stylistically when you move beyond the old maxim of rock-paper-scissors (slugger-boxer-swarmer.) Earnie Shavers might have banged the hardest, but he was relatively limited and relied on the single big boom to win the fight. Foster was a promising upcomer, but bar the decent jab, showed little sophistication and failed to live up to the expectations. Ron Lyle was the most dangerous of them all with great chin, great power, and decent skills. Still, the fact that he was relatively inexperienced when he faced Jerry aside, he simply didn't pose the same challenge that George Foreman would.

    Foreman is leagues above the other trio when it comes to dictating terms of the engagement and when at his best is one of the most accomplished ring generals in the heavyweight history. Short fighters i particular were his favorite prey — head-snapping, ramrod jab; powerful hooks and uppercuts; frames, stops, and leverage guards. All of that plus more. Needles to say, Jerry falls into the short guys category.

    Furthermore, Saddler's style (I presume we are not using Gil Clancy's Foreman) was also great at forcing suffocating exchanges, especially when combined with clever ring cutting. Quarry's tendency to brawl at times would do him no favour against Foreman with his punching power and granite chin.
     
  7. Liston73

    Liston73 Active Member banned Full Member

    866
    675
    Jun 8, 2022
    Foreman could box and had that jab I think he keeps Quarry off balance with it and gradually breaks him down.
     
    mr. magoo and swagdelfadeel like this.
  8. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,667
    12,317
    Mar 19, 2012
    Alot of fighters are fragile when Big George hits them. Norton was a very good heavyweight in a vicious era ( early to mid 70s).
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,667
    12,317
    Mar 19, 2012
    Your right. Jerry was alot of things but slow wasn't one of them.
     
    ronnyrains and Curtis Lowe like this.
  10. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,667
    12,317
    Mar 19, 2012
    Foreman probably cuts Quarry if he uses his jab. Even if Jerry is somehow winning the fight his bad luck will tap him on the shoulder.
     
    Liston73 likes this.
  11. Liston73

    Liston73 Active Member banned Full Member

    866
    675
    Jun 8, 2022
    Frazier said Jerry had fast hands.
     
    Curtis Lowe likes this.