He will be given oppotunities not offered to others because of his father (Hello Marvis Frazer!) but he hasn't enough skills or time to make any lasting impression.
How do you work that out :huh from that clip atsch by the looks of things monk could of done with some more experiance against guys who can do a few rounds and actualy hit back. If he was to fight fury next id pick fury to pick him apart
his opponent looked like he's never been into a boxing ring before. that being said, that fight didnt show much in terms of monks power. hopefully, he also has that natural power as his dad. if not, then he shouldnt even continue to box hoping to make a career out of it.
wow he is so open and doesn't use the jab. He better sharpen up a little when he steps up competition.
How can any of you talk of George Forman III style? His "opponant" gave new meaning to the term human punching bag. He stood there with his hands near his head whilst looking at the ground. So essentially the guy was blind and had no offense or defence. I have never seen anyone including a novice sparring the very first round in their life look that inept. It's impossible to assess GF III assets based on that debacle. That kind of fight is a joke and gives boxing a bad name.
This is the same situation as Ronald Hearns. George Foreman and Thomas Hearns had amatuer experience, all their sons have is the name. A great name, but just a name. It helps them but there is no way to get that experience their fathers had. I am not sure how they will do well.
I'm sorry, he will never make it to even Tyson Fury's level. He embodies everything that 70's Foreman did wrong, only that he doesn't seem to have the power to get away with his technical flaws.