Gerald McClellan v Freddie Steele

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jan 18, 2017.



  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,972
    32,932
    Feb 11, 2005
    A couple powderpuff, Fancy Dans.

    15 rounds, if that matters.

    Make your pick and state your case (preferably by using fights in their respective resumes).
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,972
    32,932
    Feb 11, 2005
    What if Marciano was on the undercard?
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  3. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    229
    Feb 19, 2012
    Day before weigh in or same day?

    Edited to add: The only guy I can think of who Steele fight who is remotely similar to McClellan is Hostak which was a bad blowout. He was injured though.

    Hmmm...
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2017
  4. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,582
    Mar 17, 2010
    Only a sick man would propose such a battle.
    It would be an incredible fight.
     
    Rock0052 and Seamus like this.
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,972
    32,932
    Feb 11, 2005
    Steele brought great footwork, elite level two-handed power and a stout chin to the ring. Discounting his post-injury record, he was pretty unbeatable at a time when the division was arguably it's deepest.

    He beat: Apostoli, Garcia, Risko three times, Barth, Kreiger, Overlin, Jones twice, Dundee and Lesnevich. That's a deeper win column than McClellan had (tho admittedly his career was cut short, too).
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  6. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,483
    10,630
    Apr 1, 2007
    Steele can be argued to be a top ten great at middle, a very historically deep division.

    Gerald was huge at the weight and could really punch, but he lost against guys who weren't even world class on the way up. He could be defused, out boxed, beaten. People talk about him like he went on a several year tear through the divisions best and left a trail of battered fighters in his wake. He didn't really prove much in terms of greatness or overall ability despite his highlight reel knockouts.
     
    mcvey, Clinton and Rock0052 like this.
  7. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,654
    5,672
    Jan 22, 2009
    Great post!!!!
     
  8. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,483
    10,630
    Apr 1, 2007
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    75,785
    15,844
    Sep 15, 2009
    Steele is one of the very best fighters I've ever seen.

    The way he destroyed world class opposition with such ease is incredible. The loss to Apostoli is an issue but he's also one of the best I've ever seen.

    G-,Man hits really hard but it's tough gauging how good he is with such a short resume.

    Ultimately, Benn managed to survive a war with him and win late on so I've no doubt Steele does the same.
     
    Mortal likes this.
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    I have doubt ,but come to the same conclusion.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,279
    35,079
    Apr 27, 2005
  12. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,654
    5,672
    Jan 22, 2009
    Cheers. A post like that would be a reason I peruse the Classic.
     
    Russell likes this.
  13. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,483
    10,630
    Apr 1, 2007
    Contributing quality stuff should be something all real fans aim to do. If you're bothering enough to register on a site dedicated to boxing, why not?

    If no one reminisces and talks about the past of the sport, how's it going to be remembered or meaningful? It'd be a shame.
     
    Clinton likes this.
  14. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    25,065
    28,711
    Jan 8, 2017
    I second that!!