Gerald Mcclellan

I think it speaks volumes that a gentleman like Bill has read your posts and seen you for a ****ing mong.

 

FFS... all this post tells me is that you're clueless.

 

I was indeed having a laugh but that's neither here or there, the fact remains the same, you sir are a ****, that's not a laughing matter as Im not sure you can be saved, good luck anyway:thumbsup

 

Dick head.
i care,and it bothers me!
i have to put a lot of time , effort and cash, into rectifying mistakes, that the "no ones are perfect" make.
and id love you or mclellen to come try that on my dogs,ha ha youd last about as long as Zahid Kahut did last night.:bbb

 

i think it is you and your husband bill who are a pair of mongs, simply because i dont
share your view that sumbu kalambay is an amazing all time great boxer who mclellan and benn couldnt beat, you ignorant stupid ******. you clearly have issues with g-man as a person which has clouded your already biased view. there are thousands of people on this forum who would agree with me, so why dont you start a poll and find out? untill that time, i suggest you go away and play at being a boxing pundit you waste of oxygen.

 

WIN.

This content is protected

 

:deal

 

I don't think those that are well-versed with Kalambay would say he 'struggled with Barkley' or automatically assume quick stoppage wins are 'better' than easy decision wins.


As I say, boxing is not 'who hits the hardest'.

Start a poll? Why don't you back up your criticisms of Kalambay? Still waiting to here how Sumbu struggled with Barkley. Considering I've given stylistic analysis, I cannot see how 'bias has clouded my view' in fact that's something I'm very strongly against.

European level