German Newspaper exposes Klitschko's slave contracts

stanislove12 · Feb 10, 2013

shaunster101 said: ↑

And the other people in the division also are businessmen who look after their interests, so they're not going to sign these shitty contracts meaning we miss out on better fights just because of the klitschko's unprecedented contract demands. It cuts both ways.
Click to expand...

yes i agree for voluantary defenses but the ones that are mandatory will still happen so we will still get the good fights... povetkin will not be subject to the same rules of fighting one brother then the other then the same one again.

Faerun · Feb 10, 2013

stanislove12 said: ↑

6) chef... this thread might bug you the most
Click to expand...

As should it, because it's the first thread containing irrefutable FACTS damaging K2's credibility and integrity. Some of the boxers we accused of ducking (Valuev, Fury, Povetkin and so forth) might've been right all along given the insight we have now. Let me repeat, a very credible German newspaper got its hands on an actual contract and found out that you are K2's slave even if you beat one of the brothers. They undisputebly proved that you as a new champ are not at liberty to act as a champ or be treated as one. Instead, you subject yourself to an unchangable fight schedule with predetermined $-share that ignores your champ status entirely.

I also want you to look at the reactions in this thread. Klittards have mostly resorted to posting bull**** pictures whereas I'm still waiting for that one klittard to step up and tell us why and how these contracts are not slave contracts. Some people appear to be so subordinated to K2 they would get away with murder. How can you possibly not be able to utter a single critical word about them?

Also, I'm not that ignorant to not realize the Klits call the shots and usually bring the money to the table (alongside Haye, Adamek), but they aren't the first to dominate a division, they are the first to capitalize so heavily on it however. Furthermore, I'm puzzled by the notion that a voluntary defense opponent has no leverage whatsoever. In the past century, HWs usually reverted to voluntaries because their mandatory was crap. I mean, Mormeck ffs? The Klits profit from voluntary defences against high profile boxers as well.

And if you guys truly have proof, that other promoters demand similarly outragous things, please present them.

Tora · Feb 10, 2013

oibighead said: ↑

Boxers work in mysterious ways.

Suppose there is a town with just one male barber; and that every man in the town keeps himself clean-shaven: some by shaving themselves, some by attending the barber. It seems reasonable to imagine that the barber obeys the following rule: He shaves all and only those men in town who do not shave themselves.

Under this scenario, we can ask the following question: Does the barber shave himself?
Asking this, however, we discover that the situation presented is in fact impossible:

- If the barber does not shave himself, he must abide by the rule and shave himself.
- If he does shave himself, according to the rule he will not shave himself
Click to expand...

i think what you were trying to say was

jhfghjawgbgdagbfyucb\usdybcyubg\ayubvuca

stanislove12 · Feb 10, 2013

Faerun said: ↑

As should it, because it's the first thread containing irrefutable FACTS damaging K2's credibility and integrity. Some of the boxers we accused of ducking (Valuev, Fury, Povetkin and so forth) might've been right all along given the insight we have now. Let me repeat, a very credible German newspaper got its hands on an actual contract and found out that you are K2's slave even if you beat one of the brothers. They undisputebly proved that you as a new champ are not at liberty to act as a champ or be treated as one. Instead, you subject yourself to an unchangable fight schedule with predetermined $-share that ignores your champ status entirely.

I also want you to look at the reactions in this thread. Klittards have mostly resorted to posting bull**** pictures whereas I'm still waiting for that one klittard to step up and tell us why and how these contracts are not slave contracts. Some people appear to be so subordinated to K2 they would get away with murder. How can you possibly not be able to utter a single critical word about them?

Also, I'm not that ignorant to not realize the Klits call the shots and usually bring the money to the table (alongside Haye, Adamek), but they aren't the first to dominate a division, they are the first to capitalize so heavily on it however. Furthermore, I'm puzzled by the notion that a voluntary defense opponent has no leverage whatsoever. In the past century, HWs usually reverted to voluntaries because their mandatory was crap. I mean, Mormeck ffs? The Klits profit from voluntary defences against high profile boxers as well.

And if you guys truly have proof, that other promoters demand similarly outragous things, please present them.
Click to expand...

Unfortunatly i dont have access to Kings, arums, golden boys contracts... some of the fights are crap (mormeck)... mandatorys don't get the same contracts... sucks to be voluntary as far as leverage but the payoff is still higher then anything else they received... want better leverage work towards mandatory.

I will fault the klitschkos for having a few shitty voluntary defenses... but i will not fault them for putting their interests highly above their voluntary opponenet's interests.

Manning · Feb 10, 2013

RUSKULL said: ↑

Exactly. Also, Faerun is a known Klitschko hater so his opinion of a credible newspaper means **** to me. The demands don't seem that ridiculous anyway given the fact that if a fighter should beat 1 brother they should want to fight the other since those are the 2 number one ranked Heavys on the planet.

You can file this under the "I don't give a ****" section of your boxing posts............
Click to expand...

How ironic that Fearun would use a well known US backed psyop newspaper to back up his 'case'.

atsch

Manning · Feb 10, 2013

Dee said: ↑

Dude, that's uncalled for.

I think Chef goes wayyy overboard in defence of his employers (and probably friends too)...

But there's no need for you to abuse the guy.
Click to expand...

He can't help it. He's a council estate, tracksuit wearing, benefit swindling ****.

dinovelvet · Feb 10, 2013

Its only K2 that are at the centre of these "slave contract" accusations.

They'd get a cold slap across the face if they ever attempted that **** with GB, TopRank and Hearn.

Manning · Feb 10, 2013

Rico Spadafora said: ↑

Is this any different than when Don King had the Division hostage in the 1980's? :huh

Where was the outrage then when King had contracts with fighters where they made 1 mil for a fight and walked away with 95,000 yes 95,000 after all his 'expenses' were taken out? Ask Tim Witherspoon about that.

LOL at the people on here. atsch

Yes, the Klitschko's are so evil and corrupt.
Click to expand...

They (K2) are not comparable to Don King at all. If that was the case here's how things would look.

Wbo Champ
Wlad Klitschko.

Wbc Champ
Vitali Klitschko.

Ibf champ
Johnathon Banks.

Wba Champ
Alexander ustinov

Wba Super champ
Vladimir Tereshkin

Wityh zero chance of unification.

Manning · Feb 10, 2013

dinovelvet said: ↑

Its only K2 that are at the centre of these "slave contract" accusations.

They'd get a cold slap across the face if they ever attempted that **** with GB, TopRank and Hearn.
Click to expand...

This content is protected

Banks mauls Mitchell.
"has to fight him again straight away".

atsch

tezel8764 · Feb 10, 2013

Manning said: ↑

This content is protected

Banks mauls Mitchell.
"has to fight him again straight away".

atsch
Click to expand...

The fight's cancelled, damn you're an idiot.

CHEF · Feb 10, 2013

tezel8764 said: ↑

The fight's cancelled, damn you're an idiot.
Click to expand...

the point was GB FORCED IT:deal

stanislove12 · Feb 10, 2013

tezel8764 said: ↑

The fight's cancelled, damn you're an idiot.
Click to expand...

because of a fluke injury... damn idiot.

Kevin Willis · Feb 10, 2013

Curious how overly sensitive PC types seem to have no problem throwing around words like "slave" when it fits their obvious agendas.

EuroBot · Feb 10, 2013

Kevin Willis said: ↑

Curious how overly sensitive PC types seem to have no problem throwing around words like "slave" when it fits their obvious agendas.
Click to expand...

Truly sad and disgusting. :-(

speck · Feb 10, 2013

slave contracts. keep 'em coming.

Log in or Sign up

German Newspaper exposes Klitschko's slave contracts

stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

Tora Guest

stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

EuroBot Guest

speck Milky Way Resident Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

German Newspaper exposes Klitschko's slave contracts

stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

Tora Guest

stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

EuroBot Guest

speck Milky Way Resident Full Member