Gerry Cooney- a little bit underrated

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by heizenberg, Sep 6, 2014.


  1. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    Anyone else think now and days Gerry Cooney has become a little underrated. In his prime he was given a little to much hype seeing as many were sure he was going to destroy the great Larry Holmes but I do think he deserved some of the hype. I've watched pretty much all the footage that is available of him from his prime and afterwards and have come to the conclusion that he was a pretty damn good fighter. He had one of the harder punches of all time and also had a good jab to go with it. He threw very devastating combinations to the body and head. His right hand wasn't the best but it was better then he was given credit for. He had a few impressive wins destroying Dino Dennis and defensive specialist Jimmy Young (who looked to be in good forum on that night). Of course he destroyed well passed prime Ken Norton and Ron Lyle which to me wasn't to impressive aside from the fact of how quickly he took them out. He showed very well against Larry Holmes who I consider one of the very best heavyweights of all time. Cooney was without a doubt one of his toughest challengers. After the fight with Holmes he seemed to lose his interest in boxing I thought he looked alright in his comeback fights leading to his fight with Spinks. Spinks was way to crafty for him and destroyed him, though I feel Cooney at this point wasn't nearly the force he was in the early 80's. In his next fight 3 years later against an Old George Foreman I didn't think he looked bad until he got his block knocked off by Big George. Overall I feel Cooney's biggest downfall was his lack of defense but still I'd give him a real good chance against a number of belt holders before and after his time. I also feel if he had fought more of the younger contenders in his day he probably would've beat most of them.

    A lot of people today like to shrugg him off as an over hyped fighter who beat a lot of has beens and in sense it is true he was over hyped and did beat has beens but at the same time I think in his day he was better then a lot of fighters who held world titles and very well could've been a champ himself had he pursued the WBA title.

    I'd like to here some of you're opinions on Cooney and how good he was especially in his prime. How do you rank him compared to the fighters who held the WBA titles in his era such as Dokes, Weaver, Thomas, Coetzee, Page, Tubbs, Witherspoon etc.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,243
    Feb 15, 2006
    Bottom line, he never beat anybody ranked in the top 10.

    He is questioned for good reasons!
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    It's a bit hard for me to keep from underrating Cooney with the spectre of that Michael Spinks beating not resurfacing and reminding me of how utterly helpless....with all his physical advantages at work for him...which meant nothing at all. A disgraceful whipping it was, even more so than the Holmes and Foreman ko losses. There was no excuse for that complete OWNAGE by M. Spinks....none at all.
     
  4. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    I know where you're coming from. But as I mentioned I don't think Cooney was nearly the same force on the night he fought Spinks compared to the night he fought Holmes. Also Spinks proved he was effective as a heavyweight other then being destroyed by a peak Mike Tyson. Spinks had two good wins against Larry Holmes who was faded but still good enough at the time to whoop most top heavyweights. Spinks was very crafty, awkward, and very good defensively a bad match up for Cooney. I do feel Cooney was even at his best limited but I feel he had the stuff to beat a number good fighters its just a matter of their styles.
     
  5. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    Stop with the Spinks fight already. It has been discussed many times how Cooney was hungover for that fight from alcohol and drugs.
     
  6. grumpy old man

    grumpy old man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    6
    Jun 1, 2014
    Good call.

    I always find these overrated / underrated questions a bit obscure. Simply because different people rate different fighters differently. So how are they rated? Depends who you ask.
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    For me yes he is underrated and I don't really think spinks fight when I think of cooney . I think Holmes fight or norton fight and yes I realise Norton was nowhere near prime .

    This is where I will probably get shot down but the cooney of the Holmes fight would be a 50/50 fight for wlad
     
  8. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    I agree Cooney has a good chance at Wlad especially if he can get to him. I don't see Wlad being able to withstand Cooney's body head attack should he be able to get to him and Cooney with his size and pretty good jab may be able to. On the other hand I could see Wlad destroying Cooney because of Cooney's lack of good defense and Wlad's excellent crisp punches and good boxing skills. Overall I like Wladimir Klitschko but I'd give Cooney a fair shot especially earlier in Klitschko's career when he didn't implore his constant clutching and grabbing style.
     
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Oh, ok..:yep...I guess that would make Gerry a bit stupid as well...to get drunk and hungover for an important fight such as that vs Spinks, eh?
     
  10. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,636
    5,186
    Jan 7, 2007
    I think he was a bit underrated. The heavyweight division was getting thin as he was in his prime in the early 80's. People say Norton, Lyle, and Young were past their prime which is true, but if he knocked out Earnie Shavers or Ossie Ocassio, Mike Weaver, even a comebacking Ali, he wouldn't have gotten much credit either. Also remember he also beat future cruiserweight champ ST Gordon, and fringe contender Dino Dennis.
    In his comeback wins, Phil Brown was an undefeated up and coming prospect, George Chaplin a good journeyman heavyweight, and Eddie Gregg who he had to beat in order to fight Michael Spinks, as Gregg was a rated contender.
    I really thought he would beat Spinks, but I've heard Cooney was drinking heavily during training. In the 5th round when Spinks unloaded his whole arsenal on him Cooney didn't even seem to remember how to clinch.
     
  11. closedguard

    closedguard Active Member Full Member

    744
    2
    May 17, 2014
    Cooney drank a bottle of whiskey a day and sobered himself up with cocaine added to that were his poor training habits where in the corner of the gym was a golf net used to drive golf balls. Added to the problems cooney didn't like to jab on the bags or even hit the bags for that matter because of a sore wrist. All he did was to stand in front of the mirror and stare at himself practising short left hooks thrown through the air. Then there was the knee brace that he wore, half the time he couldn't train because of his knee, he even refused to in-fight due to his knee. our game plan was to have him rush in and in-fight with Holmes since we knew that Holmes had a superior reach advantage and a looping right hand behind the jab. Therefore we wanted Gerry to parry Holme's jab then step left short LH to the head followed by short LH to the body finishing with a left upper cut.
    Gerry refused to go inside preferring to box than after the fight he said that if he could do it all over again he'd go in there fighting.
     
  12. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    Wow. You were a trainer for him or otherwise in Cooney's camp?

    So he was both often injured + had these substance abuve problems....For most of his career?

    Why could he not learn to use the right more & effectively though? Was part of it just laziness & being addicted to his punching habits?
     
  13. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,262
    15,327
    Jun 9, 2007
    I believe by then he was a closet alcoholic.
     
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Potentially Cooney could have been a great fighter but you cant rate a fighter on his potential, only on his deeds. He might have been a potential champion but it did not pan out.

    Gerry had a lot going for him but his career stalled and lost momentum, proberbly even before the Holmes fight. No real competative rounds fought for real since 1979-80, then fighting Holmes who although older was very active from 1979 until he met Cooney in 1982. It was a huge advantage but by then all the better opponents were aware of the value of the Cooney hype machine and would have priced themselves out. Imagine Joe Louis or Tyson being so inactive before challenging for titles?

    At the same point Tyson was at least active. Before Berbick Tyson had no better record than Cooney had going into the Holmes fight but he was at least staying sharp. They kept lining up fringe guys every couple of weeks for Tyson just to maintain momentum because nobody decent wanted to fight Tyson either. Cooney had little to draw upon once the Holmes fight became tough, but he still proved to be a great challenger.

    Tyson was able to fulfil his potential but with Cooneys activity he might not have looked so good at championship level or got past Holmes either.

    What is worse is that unlike Ray Mancini or other strong chalengers who failed in their first title attempt Cooneys career stalled after one loss. He never really got going again.

    You cant rate on potential.
     
  15. SILVER SKULL 66

    SILVER SKULL 66 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    47
    Oct 6, 2013
    Gee whose fault was that:roll: