Heavyweight champions are the best fighters in the world and can talk as much trash as they like because they can back it up against any other boxer. Can the same be said about Davis?
Wilder refused to back it up until last week. He beats one legit top 5 guy and then a load of posters here start circle jerking over it. Calm the **** down.
I meant abour Wilder scoring his maiden top tier win. It's a statt but nothing to start... you know what? Whatever.
In a weird sort of way, this could be Davis' long-term plan behind bad-mouthing Wilder (and potentially others): going the Floyd / Broner route of mouthing off and generally acting obnoxiously, thus convincing people to pay to watch Davis in the hopes of seeing him get a good pasting. If Loma does fight Davis, we all know what the end result will be; but that won't stop me paying good money to watch Davis get schooled and No Mas'd by Loma. This content is protected
That would be a tomboy. Speaking of which, anyone remember when tomboys used to turn out to be very feminine, ladylike stunners in many cases? In 2018, odds are they'll be referred to Tavistock, told they should be male and pumped full of drugs.
Lomachenko wants to fight Davis, but Void will not allow it..................Wilder is a sick joke, Joshua will knock him out and Fury will toy with him..................hell, Wilder almost got knocked out by an old 50 year old man who is sick, on meds.............
Okay...how exactly are people confused by the concept of a "tom-girl"? A tomboy is a girl that acts boyish. Hence the opposite, a tom-girl, is necessarily a boy that acts girlish. How could you possibly have a hard time keeping that straight? I feel like these are the same people that 50 years ago would've been unable to ever remember whether Playboy or Playgirl is the publication that catered to whatever their orientation was.
It doesn't matter whether you have or you haven't. If you've heard "tomboy", inverting the meaning is just a matter of common sense.