Get the f*** out with Pac-JMM already!

O well then Bradley Pacquiao was not a robbery. I had it 9-3 for Marquez as did many posters. The ESB poll as well as polls in other forums have around 80-85% for Marquez.

But again, if Marquez Pacquiao 3 was not a robbery then neither was Bradley Pacquiao.

 

This is *******ism at it's best.:rofl:rofl

Bro your boy got his ass whooped by Marquez and he knows it. Why you think they doing a 4th fight?

Last I checked Barrera and Morales did not have a 4th fight and neither did Gatti nor Ward.

Manny will be in a future interview in a few years (just as SRL was) and he'll admit Marquez won that 3rd fight (just as SRL admitted Tommy won the 2nd fight).

Get over it.

*******s are funny. 2 fights are robberies but when there boy gets the wrong nod they ***** and complain..when it's in his favor they say "oh well it was close."

So again, if Manny-Marquez 3 was a close but clear decision then so was Bradley Pacquiao.

 

Exactly. Even on this forum it is almost all ONLY Pacquiao fans (maybe a few other fans) who don't consider it a robbery.

LOL at the polls

46 percent for Marquez by the media poll
42 percent a draw by the media poll
12 percent for Manny (LMFAO 12 PERCENT)

FAN POLL

71% for Marquez
29% for Manny

That is a robbery period. Only haters and *******s will not admit.

Note-John Anthony ducked my ban bet as I took him up on it.

 

Scenario 4:

Pac's career is over, so there is no longer any reason to protect his record.

The mob can make a LOT more money if JMM wins, so they rig the odds, bet heavily, and force the judges to actually turn in accurate scorecards.
JMM gets the decision & Pac retires in shame.

--------

I STILL wouldn't pay $50 to see it, as I'm tired of the whole damn circus, but I'd sure like it to happen.

 

Never thought BG was a *******:think

 

K then he is the alternative, which would be a hater. Either way he consistently takes away from Floyd while consistently giving Manny a pass.