GGG against.....

This is what I think...hell, maybe the fans felt the same way when Marciano beat the tar out of Don C0ckell and had to settle for a sub par tko....I've never heard such overreactions before.

 

But those guys weren't WW's like Brook.

 

Hagler was a machine who stood up to some of the heaviest punchers in the 80's MW division. I won't bet against him. I don't know if the other 3 were durable enough, but they all had power that GGG has yet to face. I'll pick RJJ to beat him too.

 

I thought McClellan was a good bet!

 

OTE="Unforgiven, post: 18160246, member: 2761"]Having said that, I thought McClellan would smash Benn too.[/QUOTE]
I thought McClellan was a good bet!

Brook's foot work isn't anything special Golovkin's is excellent but p4p the best ever at cutting off the ring?That takes in a lot of territory.

 

I don't like Hearns v Golovkin .

 

Is he? Just for one fight, where he knew he wasn't going to outbox his younger and faster opponent. He was actually smart to brawl quickly vs. Brook and neglect defense.

Watch below, and you'll see plenty of defense.

This content is protected

 

I thought McClellan was a good bet!




Brook's foot work isn't anything special Golovkin's is excellent but p4p the best ever at cutting off the ring?That takes in a lot of territory.[/QUOTE]

Brooks is undeniably quick at 147, at 160 he's blazing fast. Chavez who until GGG was the best at cutting off the ring, was never as precise and actually made mistake.

GGG when he wants to pressure is literally perfect, I don't think he took a wrong step the entire fight.