Looks to me like he struggled in that first round and for large parts of the second too. He only won 2 of the 4 rounds too against a fighter who's not really that good. Not that it proves a great deal either way.
In their other fight Dirrell won by 1 point at a USA/Kazakhstan duel that took place in Nebraska or some redneck state.
Which is absolutely irrelevant? Going by OP's standards, I could easily call this a thrashing of Golovkin. Yet you won't call him out on his hyperbolic rubbish. You can even make a case for Dirrell having won both fights honestly.
Dude you have some serious problems. I wish you are smart enough to ask help and you get better, but for the moment - please leave.
I'm acutally really impressed by Golovkin's holding here, he hasn't really had to use this in the pros hopefully he still has this weapon in his locker.
Dirrel won? Are you kidding? A lot of Dirrel hits were not counted? Have you counted how many of Golovkins hits were not counted? The point difference would have been much worse for Dirrel if everything that GGG had hit would have counted. That was a very clear win. And also exactly on this Olympics GGG was forced to go to higher class because of another boxer in the team.