Murray, Geale, Stevens, Ouma, Rosado, Proksa (back when he was still taking boxing seriously), all decent, but not great wins, I think the best for GGG is still yet to come (Jacobs, Canelo, Ward)
Murray beat a damaged Martinez but he was twice the fighter Cotto fought. Murray also beat Sturm but was robbed. Geale is a good win too.
I'd forgotten about Proksa. He actually looked like he could fight a bit. He may have been somebody if Golovkin hadn't wrecked him.
Talking about Murray...I think I had him losing to khomitsky in the rematch. Golovkin TKO vs Khomitsky is VERY impressive.
lool hell no we are talking about the guy who got dominated and downed by Hassam n dam in a 16 feet ring atsch
I love the presumptuous third party glorification of the Stevens winÂ…nice defensive touch. Geale, Murray and Rosario stand out as decent wins, hopefully the best is yet to come from the 30 something year old who's best wins are mentioned above, he's a beast no doubt.
Boxing doesnt work like that darling If the so called champs can duck the best, which they now do continually, then you need a different criteria
lol@ some of these jokes "stevens would spark cotto and canelo"....well ummm ....i mean stevens campaigned at 168...cotto is a welter and canelo never fought above 155 yet...lol "murray would easily beat cotto and canelo"....and you guys want ggg to fight these guys too? lol...its kinda sad.....
I'm a Brit, so I'll say Murray ... But, unfortunately Murray for all his heart and technical skills simply can't stop mid-top level opponents , hence his feeble KO%. So he was never a danger to GGG. Geale on paper, but Cotto dismantling him so easily hugely diminishes that win. Rubio rolled over and came in pay cheque damagingly overweight. Macklin is shot. Rosado got beaten more convincingly by Lemiuex who hurt him with every shot and knocked him down, something Golovkin couldn't do. TBF it's not a very awesome resume for whatever the reasons.