GGG has transcended past any belts.

good post. but - which belts has he transcended, please be specific, thanks.

 

I think what you are saying is he lost the belts yet it does not matter because he does not need them. So he really didn't lose.

 

i am asking the opinion of someon who stated an incomplete one, why are asking mine, I didnt start the thread.

If you start a thread then the onus is on you to qualify the question that YOU posed. So - I ask again - which belts does he transcend?

ibf?
wba?
wbc?
lineal?
ibo?

other non-MW belt?


Thanks for your forthcoming clarification to YOUR question, if it comes.

 

He doesn't need them ? But I thought that was what GGG was all about : getting more belts and unifying the division. Remember "Canelo give me my belt". Then he loses all his belts to Canelo and now he doesn't need them lmao.

 

Based his resume I find it hard pressed to even consider him certified HOF'er but if guys like Gatti got in based off of guts and determination I guess you can say he's qualified. With his style he's likely to get brain damaged.

 

so you think he has transcended all the MW titles?
but he hasnt actually won the lineal so how can you transcend something without winning it?

so which of the wba, wbc, ibf, wbo, ibo has he transcended? If you mean IBO then yes certainly but he transcended that years ago beating Lemmy for his first major title collection in the ring.

explain your mistake, thanks. this time answer if you can do so. yeh how come you keep NOT answering about your very OWN thread, wierd.

 

I get what you are saying. He probably doesn't he is elite now, but the belts were sort of his identification. Canelo came out on top because he got the decision, regardless of people saying Oscar set it up or whatever. He won one of the fights.

 

hey Tim you not answering. Maybe you need timeout.

 

Taylor did what?

 

Usual suspects like flies to ****

 

The irony of this is hilarious.