oh wait my bad ... you are right ... this is World? I never post here .. so I dont know why you quoted me here ?? I post in Classic ... this must be where you Trannys post ... stay out of classic then and we are good
Just making contact after I realized your modus operandi. I thought it was funny that's all. I don't care for GGG's resume either.
dont back pedal now you ****ing tranny.... you decided to quote me and talk **** and call me a HO BO ..... but you didnt realize you were paying me a compliment comparing me to Rutger ****ing Hauer !! ... thats why I called you a rookie because you dont know what the **** you are talking about ... theres nothing wrong with GGG resume **** face ... he out pointed Canelo twice ... Which was the ****ing original point of my post !!!
You should change your name to Star child with the amount of stars you use for nonexistent letters. lol.
So this is your logic.. I sent you a Rutger Hauer movie that you have never seen but I'm the one that doesn't know about Rutger Hauer?
its the word filter you dumb **** ..... thats why you should go back to penn st swim team cheerleading and root for your boyfriend ,,, you dont belong here
Penn St and cheer leaders have nothing to do with your rising estrogen levels so keep them out of the Conversation! GGG resume is mediocre at best and everyone knows it.
Eubank Jr has told us that GGG ducked him to fight Kell Brook, which is a very interesting twist in the tale. The most interesting part of that tale is the fact that Kell Brook was offered the fight by Hearn when the Eubank fight fell through, to 'save the show'. So Golovkin must have known all the way up to the last signing, when the venue was booked and everything organised, that he was going to duck Eubank and that Brook would say yes to the fight on short notice. Well played, Gennady, well played!
This is the type of **** post about which I previously referred. GGG was ducked for most of his career - Canelo made him wait several years before their first fight - a blatant A-side robbery. Rinse and repeat twice. Explain analytically why I am wrong (you can't). What is the point of the post? It is a clear diatribe trying to indirectly extoll the non-existent virtues of the current destroyer of boxing - Clenelo Allthepeds, who continues to be supported by the governing bodies at the top all the way down to the naive casuals, propagating the lie that Clenelo is a great boxer, when he is but a ped-guzzling cash-cow. The side effect - more of these types of posts.
We hear about mismanaged careers in the cases of Beterbiev and GGG but the truth is they were avoided like the plague. Don't change history - accept that the man in the poster above your bed is too scared to fight the real champions.