GGG should vacate the IBF strap: Dchenko vs Charlo for the title lol

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by GK BOX, May 8, 2018.


  1. GK BOX

    GK BOX Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,833
    6,109
    Nov 23, 2015
    Just check out the rankings.
    D Chenko number 1 vs Charlo no 4. No 2 spot is vacant and no 3 spot is Jacobs, they are stable mates!
    So it would be Charlo vs Dchenko for the vacant strap.
    How much would they make for that fight??
    Lol
    Dump the belt GGG and let these young hungry lions fight each other for it
     
  2. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,153
    9,880
    Aug 1, 2012
    But I thought vacating titles is a big no-no amongst Golovkin fans. Isn't vacating a title a sign of weakness, isn't not fighting your mandatory like one of the most cowardly things you can possibly do according to Golovkin fans?

    Remember when Canelo vacated the WBC Belt, Golovkin fans had a field day. But now all of a sudden it's OK for Golovkin to vacate his title? How does that work?
     
    Hanz Cholo and 22JM like this.
  3. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,712
    Aug 7, 2010
    I want him to get Saunders belt and then he can bin them all off. I want him to be undisputed even if it's only for one night.
     
    kriszhao and kk17 like this.
  4. GK BOX

    GK BOX Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,833
    6,109
    Nov 23, 2015
    GGG is a much much much bigger draw than Dchenko. IBF is being unreasonable in ordering a fight within 90 days. Whereas everyone and their mother was begging for the GGG Canelo fight. GGG was mandatory for years with the WBC. Dchenko just became mandatory a year ago being Tureano Johnson. GGG has the charlo mandatory as well.
    So, why dont the two unproven mandatories fight each other! Then, GGG would fight the winner and take care of 2 obligations in 1.
     
    kriszhao and SnatchBox like this.
  5. Dagnaldinho

    Dagnaldinho Active Member Full Member

    1,460
    1,536
    Sep 16, 2017
    I think GGG has outgrown the belts now. GGG without the belts is a big enough draw he doesnt need them. He should search the big money fights between 154-168 and retire. Dont let the mandatorys dictate who you fight and take control of your career now.

    EDIT: If the Canelo fight counts as a successful defence of the titles because retained them, he might actually have tied with Hopkins for 20. If he hasnt then id vacate.
     
  6. GK BOX

    GK BOX Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,833
    6,109
    Nov 23, 2015
    he's tied the record
     
    Dagnaldinho likes this.
  7. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    I don't think this is about Golovkin.

    Derevyanchenko vs Charlo is an awesome fight and I'd love to see it. To be honest it interests me more than the Canelo vs GGG rematch.

    Doesn't "excuse" GGG for dropping a belt but it's completely clear he's only after money fights now, in fact it's been like that for a while now.
     
  8. kk17

    kk17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,170
    906
    Jun 23, 2007
    I like that idea the contenders @160 like Charlo, Derevyanchenko, Murata, Andrade and Jacobs should fight each other anyway. Charlo, Derevyanchenko and Andrade are unproven @160
     
  9. jaytxxl

    jaytxxl Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,568
    3,479
    Mar 1, 2010
    This content is protected
    But he didn’t care about Canelo remember just give me my belt #allthebelts.. Lol I love GGG but that didn’t matter after a $15 mil payday.. never forget for guys who have favorite fighters that believe they won’t change when big money gets involved.. MONEY CHANGES EVERYBODY..
     
    GK BOX likes this.
  10. GK BOX

    GK BOX Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,833
    6,109
    Nov 23, 2015
    of course its all about the money
    why else did ggg chase canelo so badly
    anyone who denies that is a foolish dummy
     
  11. 22JM

    22JM Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    3,928
    Sep 10, 2016
    LMFAO so now you guy's are ok with dumping belts? Omg LMFAO
     
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,242
    23,925
    Jul 21, 2012
    Why is it ok for GGG to avoid Mandos but it wasn't for Felix Strum?

    Murray , Macklin and Zibik were bigger fights than Golovkin at the time. Back then the German market didn't know Golovkin from Khoren Gevor.

    For donkeys years Golovfans claimed there was no justice in GGG not getting a fight with Sturm , now they are perfectly fine with him doing the same to Derevyanchenko.
     
  13. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    Exactly. Especially once they are getting towards the end of their careers.
     
    jaytxxl likes this.
  14. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    I'm not excusing Golovkin. Just would like to see Derevyanchenko vs Charlo, that's all.
     
  15. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,242
    23,925
    Jul 21, 2012
    A mandatory challenger isn't going to risk his shot at the title by fighting another mandatory challenger.
    How it usually works is he fights one mando and that earns him the right for a voluntary defense against a bum before moving onto the other mandatory.
    If he dumps the IBF belt it will undermine everything he has ever said and proves he was only ever about easy no-risk fights.