most will just pick 4 off of the p4p lists (maybe Mayweather, Rigondeaux, Ward, Wlad). I think most would agree that the majority of HWs would beat him
Golovkin is so good he may not have fought the best comp but who ever he fights he beats the living crap out of them and I enjoy it very much.
Floyd Ward Rigo These are the only guys arguably better than him But none of them are remotely as exciting to watch
Mayweather Ward Bradley Rigondeaux Wladimir --- I could name 20 who are better, P4P, at the moment... Opinions of skills and future greatness are just that; opinions. Accomplishments are all that matter. Yes, they are based on opinions as well but as long as you can set your bias aside you can properly rate what the consensus feeling for opponents beaten are. And that list is not impressive for Golovkin if you are trying to argue him as a top 10 fighter today. I couldn't do it if my life depended on it.
If you bring in resume, then thats a whole different debate As far as "better" goes, Wlad or Tim couldnt hold Golovkins jockstrap
