Thanks for the link to eye on the Ring, i gave up looking for it. The thing one can observe by viewing this is there are rounds that some gave to GGG that was generally viewed as Canelo rounds. The thing is Canelo won a few clear rounds, but the rest were close. GGG never let Canelo get carried away, and Canelo knew that he better respect GGG and pace himself or he could make himself vulnerable down the stretch to a very dangerous apponent. My honest fight night score, which i feel is very accurate was, i had round one even, but upon rewatch i thought GGG won it clearly but close. Rounds 2-8 i had for Canelo, and rounds 9-12, i had for GGG. Rounds 6 and 8 were very close as was round two. Those giving it to Canelo 11-1 or 10-2 might as well have turned off the picture and listened to the DAZN telecast only, who had GGG landing only one or two jabs in round one, they being biased as they were gave GGG 3 rounds only which i thought was absurd.
I don't have a problem with 7-4-1 Canelo. That's very favorable GGG scoring, though. Round 1 was pretty even, 10-10 is fair there. All I'm saying is that rounds 9-12, while GGG stepped it up, those weren't all clear for GGG. You can argue those for GGG, like you can argue 1-4 against Bivol for Canelo. The problem is that you want to claim that GGG won 5 rounds like 2 judges had it but then say Canelo winning 5 rounds against Bivol like 3 judges had it is corrupt. If you want to take that approach, that it was 7-5 or 7-4-1, which I think is very favorable for GGG but certainly arguable, then you should at least respect the fact that 7-5 Bivol is arguable and acceptable as well. GGG arguably "edged" rounds 9-12, Canelo arguably "edged" rounds 1-4 against Bivol, but those were each very even "could go either way" kinda rounds. You could just as easily score 9-12 to Canelo and have it 11-0-1. It's really splitting hairs to choose who won rounds like 1-4 against Bivol or 9-12 against GGG.
Ive only watched the Bivol fight about 3 times, i scored it without sound as well. I can say this, Canelo was sure trying and slinging missiles, and was dangerous, but couldnt get it done. Both those fights were different. The trilogy fight , i was very disappointed in, but now i see what he was up to, and he came up short.
Would be a war, but im not sure a 40 year old GGG can go to war with a young buck at this stage of his career. Munguia can crack and GGG would be right in front of him so he wouldnt be hard to find, i wouldnt say GGG is completely shot but hes not what he once was (obviously) when he was trying to get a young Munguia in the ring with little experience at the higher level. This version of Munguia stands a chance to win, while the younger version would have gotten obliterated. 55/45 in favor of the Munguia. I have it a pretty close fight because Munguia takes punches to the dome like its the thing to do, and if Chenko was hurting him im sure GGG would hurt him as well.