GGG vs Bhop at 175

wait till 3g has built up a LHW pedigree, as he will when he moves up to conquer the division.#


then u can decide. Otherwise bhop can only be assumed to smash him, if faded bhop can still pick up a title at LHW against cherrypicks.

 

I'm not sure GGG could even make LHW. He's not even a very big MW.

 

Hmm... Former World Champ t 175 or guy who's never even fought close to that weight... Gee, I'll have to think about this one!

 

Next up Wladimir Klitschko v Ricardo Lopez, who wins at HW?

 

Hopkins vs Pavilk all over again! at 160 GGG will be more competitive but still loses

 

I hope Smoger is the ref

 

Because a mimiumweight vs a superheavyweight is the same as a MW vs a LHW ..wtf

 

GGG would probably be a bit flabby at 168 at 175 it would be silly, as you say its well known GGG's a very average sized Middle. He probably could've turned over from Am to Pro at 154, its not out the question...Also Hopkins turned pro at 175 and drained down most his career to make 160lb. Id say prime there's a natural size difference between them, just Hopkins drained more to make weight

 

Golovkin didn't have a drink problem though. Pressure would toll on Hopkins in this one imo

 

We should do Calzaghe vs de la Hoya at 175 next!



I'll take GGG over Hopkins at 160 though.

 

The same people who say GGG can't win because he is a 160 pound guy who never fought at 175. Are the exact same people who say 150 to 160 pound Bob Fitzsimmons, 160 pound Harry Greb, 170 pound Gene Tunny, and 180 pound Rocky Marciano and Jack Dempsey could beat 6'2 to 6'6 220 pound to 250 pound guys like George Foreman, Lennox Lewis, Riddick Bowe, Anthony Joshua , Wladimir and Vitali Klistchko because size doesn't matter. Anyway size does matter. A prime Hopkins makes GGG look like a amateur and I hate Bernard Hopkins.

 

Hopkins by UD.

 

Go watch Pavlik vs Hopkins and you would see an eerily similar UD without Pavlik or GGG winning a round