Nunn? Mc Callum? I checked GGG’s record, Nunn and Mike would have been his best wins. B level fighter Jacobs is all he has and that win was disputed
Thanks for your replies, Sorry if your agony with your own words in a post -modem sense. Picking a sure fire hall of fame fighter 50.50 as you attempt vs a mere contender who didn't really beat anyone is way out there, but hey that's your opinion. PS: You failed to answer two of questions, and often went into spin excuse mind on those you did.
who has GGG beaten that is better than Reggie, Nunn or Mike you pathetic fool??? 60 pages of nothing You answer that question
This content is protected [url] This content is protected [/url] This content is protected dinovelvet Typical coward tactics as to be expected from you. I predicted a duck and here lies the duck. The power punches were landed in majority by Jacobs. In 8 of the 12 rounds , Jacobs outlanded GGG on power punches. This is why the fight was so close as power punches represent clean and effective punching. A jab or grazing jab is clicked off in the total punch category. Those type of hits don't capture the eye of the judges as much as power punches. You can't respond to these facts , that is why you have responded to arguments i never made. Now , if Jacobs can out land GGG in enough power punches to make the fight razor close , what do think the more active and far more skilled Toney would do? Posts like these which deal in facts expose you as a ducker who can only respond in insults What are you tallying about? I Just called you out for bad facts, and corrected you big time. There was no duck. If you watched the fight, there was not one significant blow that even came close to remotely hurting GGG. " Power punches " don't mean they land with more force, they only mean they are not jabs. In addition to what ever problem you have, add the inability to admit yoru wrong is part of your issues. PS :Can you show us your score Dino? I predict this will be a duck. A duck is case you don't know is avoiding the question, not spinning facts. GGG beat Jacobs cleanly. -Mendoza
Who did Reggie Beat again, and let's take a look a 7 losses and a draw. Your really not very good at this, are you? Wanna talk about that one? You are easy to bury, let me know. Mike at age 35 past his prime woud not beat a GGG in his prime. The Judges felt Nunn was way up. Official Judging Bob Watson 99 - 91 - in favor of Nunn Dalby Shirley 98 - 92 -in favor of Nunn Gary Merritt 97 - 93 - n favor of Nunn Toney swung for the fences, and Nunn wasn't smart, letting Tony's trash talk get to him. Where was the re-match? If there was one, Nunn wins it.
Oh dear @Mendoza completely exposed and embarrassed once again!! Doza your ass has been paddled something cruel in this thread , its actually getting sad to witness at this stage.
Because you need glasses. You need to watch the fight You need to watch the fight You need to watch the fight Yeah, that's my opinion too. Yep Nope Both Yes it can Nunn was 6-4 (or 7-3 depending how you score) up and he was giving Toney a schooling Bagel, bagel pastrami
Do you deny Golovkin was out landed by Jacobs in power punches ? Since we all know you won't answer questions , yes , yes he was. This fact doesn't bode well for his chances against a guy of Toney's calibre because Toney would perform better than glass chin Jacobs.. You just got struck out again. Once again , who outlanded who in power punches?? Jacobs did.
The depth of fanboyism on this thread is astonishing. If some random guy checks in with a pro-Golovkin post he's immediately set upon. Toney better check behind his nuts for a group of homonculi tightly grasped to his wrinklies
I think GGG out-landed Jacob's in 8 rounds, with one round even, and floored him ( 10-8 round ) , winning the fight. Jacobs didn't land one power punch that shook or hurt GGG. Jacobs landing 18 more " power punches " was not enough to change anything as GG landed 56 more total punches. I also think GGG was in decline by this fight. Now don't duck my question, who do you think own this fight? You card?
He didn't land one hurtful punch no? Well thats a falsity and ill prove it by showing you rather than telling you. [url]https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AdolescentAmusedBudgie-size_restricted.gif[/url] Tell me again that wasn't a hurtful 2 shot combo. Those type of stingers tamed the beast in Golovkin and made him reluctant to go hamhock like he did on the soup cans he was previously running through. We saw the exact same happen when GGG fought fast , skilled counter puncher Canelo. GGG knows his style isn't suitable for walking down guys who can open him up and Toney is certainly going to be better at it than Jacobs and Canelo. Therfore the notion GGG walks down and outworks Toney is noting but a pipe dream Who did I think won? Golovkin edged it. Most people saw a close fight , expect for the biased fanboys.
Golovkin wasn't hurt in that clip. He's got a top chin and took it well. As I told you , GGG was in decline any this fight, yet he won if UD, by 2-3 points if you know how to score a fight. The two judges that had is 115-112 were good cards. Being up by 3 points isn't edging it Dino. That would be a split decision, or winning by 1 point. That is edging it. GGG beat Canelo at age 35-36. Past his prime. Golovkin weighed in at 169.6 pounds on the second day weigh in, while Jacobs was estimated weighing around 180 pounds during the fight. There was a noticeable size advantage for Jacobs. And a noticeable age advantage for Jacobs, yet he lost cleanly.