GGG vs James Toney at MW

Another one who dosen't get that GGG was past prime... I'm going to have to put you on block if you carry on with this ignorance.

 

Because he was too inconsistent, that's not even up for debate.
Like if GGG had a draw with a guy like Williams, you fanbois would be using that as evidence to state he never belonged in the ring with some of the past greats.

 

You're getting so desperate now.

I made a reference to Roy ONCE.

I said that by the time James had fought Roy in 1994, he'd already had 46 fights at just 26 years of age.

The reason I made that point, was to highlight how different GG's career path has been.

Again, I'm a big GG fan myself. But if GG had followed that same timeline, you have no idea if he'd still have his zero.


Are you not going to respond to post 132, on page 9 of this thread?

 

He's destroying everything you post. Quit being so thick headed and stubborn and try to learn a little something instead.

 

He's not destroying anything, are you his mother?

 

Get real man.

You're going to put me on ignore?


You are the one who has:

Invented statements that have never been made.

Labelled Reggie Johnson as a journeyman.

Labelled Jacobs as an A level fighter.

Spoken of Jacobs and Nunn having similarities.


You are lucky that we haven't put you on ignore.


Like yourself, many of us here are also fans of GG.

I am a big fan of his. But if you're going to make silly statements, then you're going to be questioned on it.


There's no need to threaten to put people on ignore just because they don't agree with you. That's playground stuff. That's how losers like Shockmaster behave.

 

I never replied to that post because I've already answered all of the retorts you brought up, well what Herol brought up as he was quoting it all.

 

You are just making an idiot of yourself. Most of those you are arguing with are fans of 3G as well.

 

Its what you havent done, not what others "would do"

SUch as - that you CANNOT yet offer anything of 3G to indicate his elitedom, apart from a draw with Canelo, is rather the issue.

If you have an argument to offer please share it, but no more self destructive ones please.

 

Why is it that some of the dumbest and most stubborn posters here try tend to think they are so smart when about all they post prove otherwise?

 

The jacobs to Michael nunn comparisons are just cringe-worthy!! Only a simpleton could come up with that silly statement...

 

I never invented anything, you called Jacobs a **** name to have on his resume. If 160lb Toney fought Jacobs back in the 80's, you sure as hell would have him down as a name, as well as Canelo and Brook. You'd probably even read the boxrec of more fighters he faced to try to big them up to suit your agenda. I've seen you do it with Roy.
I'm not repeating that again.

Johnson is a journeyman. His only name is drained Collins.
I'm not repeating that again.

Jacobs is a world class fighter. With one loss to a prodigy who a lot of people would have beaten GGG, the guy who went on to rule the division.
I'm not repeating that again.

Jacobs and Nunn fought on the back-foot and threw bombs in either hand! There's your similarities.
I'm not repeating that again.

I want you to put me on ignore, it'll save you from stressing out and you can have more time writing that fiction of yours on your website.

 

Only a simpleton would defend, Loudon. No disrespect.

 

Your posts are not better than mine. I just give my opinion on here, if you don't agree with what I say, you can gladly find something else to read.

 

Says the guy calls Reggie johnson a journeyman. Just fess up and admit you really don't know anything about that era, since you've proven you don't have much a clue about these guys.