GGG vs Michael Nunn.

The problem was that they-Nunns team were trying to make his style more fan friendly to get the big bouts .
So by the time of the Toney bout Nunn had altered his style.
Second problem was that Nunn couldn't stay away from his hometown of Davenport. Every time he went home their were problems.
Third problem was he came at the wrong time-Leonard didn't want to fight him. Hearns didn't either. At one point NOBODY wanted to fight him.Tall slick southpaw .
And Nunn could punch when he wanted to.
Nobody ever knocked out Kalambay and Nunn did. Stopped Roldan .And Curtis Parker was at the end of his career but still very tough and Nunn starched him.

 

Natural size is massively in favour of Nunn. He would have been able to compete against massive super middleweight and been just as big. Ggg isn' very big even at middleweight. In natural weight terms it' almost like a middle v light heavy. Saying that golovkin p4p and with what he does is the better fighter. I think if Nunn fought the fight of his life he edges on points but golovkin could stop him late or edge it on points with cutting off the ring and hard punches landed. Ok so I'm sitting on fence there. ...... I'll go golovkin edging it on points earning a knockdown on route