GGG vs SRL

Because it's known that Hagler was washed up by then. Everyone except you knows this.

SRL too, but not as badly as MMH

 

This forum has become a joke.

 

ah the old "everyone nows this" to try and give your statement credibility, instead of actually attempting to give it credibility with evidence. fail.

neither was washed up.

 

Sure thing.

"If I’d have been given the decision [against SRL] I would almost certainly have continued boxing and (chased) Carlos Monzon’s record (the most defences of the middleweight title). “That would have taken another year and I would have kept going after my prime, and that would have been sad because after 65 fights and 14 years as a professional it was time to bow out; and a lot of times that ‘one last fight’ is a huge mistake."

http://www.secondsout.com/news/main-news/hagler-sugar-ray-ran-like-a-rabbit

Hagler himself admits he was at the end of his prime.

 

end of prime is not washed up.

you just destoryed your own argument, I didnt even need to reply.

 

Looks like you just flopped again

 

goodbye until you can answer. dont let it eat you too much.

 

Flop, mate.

 

Srl would have won better skills plus more heart srl proven atg.the first decent fighter g fights hes gonna get whup

 

gstring fans make these fantasy fights knowing that taxicab driver aint going near a top middleweight. So they are left with dreams and a nuttsack to hug.

 

Give me a break!!!

SRL beats GGG in an easy nights work