Yes, GGG could be losing by 4rounds but at the end of the day, with enough pressure and strength from GGG, hearns would fold.
Hearne would get destroyed quicker than he did against hagler. NO way could he absorb more than a couple clean ggg shots
Seriously, how can we fairly judge what happens in this fight? Rosado had GGG's face quite messy imagine what a long hard fight with Hearns would produce. I like triple G but lets not go crazy here everyone looks at Hearns as a big puncher with a weak chin but they forget the guy was long rangy and had great boxing skills, he kept most swarmers at bay with a long accurate jab.
Is this thread some sort of sick joke? I rate GGG, but who has he fought/beat to even begin being compared to Hearns?
just a question but what is hearns resume like at 160. lost to hagler lost to barkley. beat roldan,dewitt. his light heavyweight resume is probably better, anyway we know hearns is one of the best p4p punchers from 147-175. So he is definitely worth the ko, just we dont know how iron golovkins chin is yet.
Troll thread. In case you hadn't noticed Lil Boosie and El Chicano regularly start stupid troll threads comparing GGG to this or that ATG/ HOFer just to wind people up. The same Lil Boosie also recently posted that Rubio walks down GGG and stops him - perhaps he reckons that Rubio beats Hearns too?
Not Hearns best weight but I wouldn't pick against him here. Hearns is much better than anyone Golovkin has faced. Golovkin is far too easy to hit and would undoubtedly be the first to feel their opponents power. Unless Golovkin has a Hagler like chin which is unlikely he gets KO'ed early.