GGG willing to fight Murata in Japan!?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by drenlou, Oct 27, 2017.


  1. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    @drenlou I don't get how you and @Pimp C think GGG is ducking Charlo when Charlo himself says that the one who ducked him was Canelo.
     
    kk17, ForemanJab, BCS8 and 1 other person like this.
  2. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,132
    39,611
    Sep 29, 2012
    Yeah the "A-side doe" logic suddenly vanishes when it's someone who isn't liked.
     
    mirkofilipovic, radupidu, iii and 2 others like this.
  3. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,523
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
    I never used the word ducking.. I'm talking about why they're demanding their mando to fight Jacobs yet express interest in a Murata fight? It doesn't make sense to me..
     
  4. Vysotskyy

    Vysotskyy Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,457
    385
    Oct 1, 2013
    Derevyanchenko has been IBF mandatory longer with him and Murata both being more deserving than Charlo. Get in line.
     
    kk17 and radupidu like this.
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,043
    35,137
    Jun 23, 2005
    Was Charlo ever Canelo's mando?
     
    drenlou and MidniteProwler like this.
  6. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,694
    80,963
    Aug 21, 2012
    Impossible! But there's a test to determine the truth of that statement ;) Which cartoon series accurately predicted that Trump would become the POTUS? You have 60 seconds!
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  7. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    No. Hence I don't agree with Charlo there.

    But the plain fact is that Golovkin has three mandos right now: Charlo, Derevyanchenko, and Murata plus the contractual obligation to fight Canelo next.

    None of the mandos have yet been enforced so all are meaningless.
     
    kk17 likes this.
  8. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,523
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
    I'd like that fight as well... point being, fight your ****ing mandatories plain and simple.
     
  9. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    I've already agreed with you that Team GGG have no right to demand Charlo fight Jacobs next.
     
    drenlou likes this.
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,694
    80,963
    Aug 21, 2012
    And I'd like to see Canelo, then Saunders, then whoever out of Charlo, Dere and Murata. At this rate Jacobs is never getting his rematch :thinking:
     
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,523
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
    If no Canelo rematch, then GGG has to fight Charlo per the WBC.
     
  12. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,028
    27,655
    Jul 26, 2004
    Agreed
     
    drenlou likes this.
  13. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    Yes, exactly.

    If Canelo doesn't want the immediate rematch and Golovkin chooses to fight someone else (apart from BJS/Lemiuex to become undisputed as unification trumps mando) I'd be unhappy with him too and advocate stripping.

    But:
    1) This Murata talk is all after the WBC mandatory has been fulfilled. No relation to Charlo.
    2) Unless Canelo pulls out, Golovkin has no chance to fight Charlo in the near future. Besides Derevyanchenko might get enforced first.
     
    drenlou likes this.
  14. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,523
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
    Jacobs has to beat Skalinski! Lololol
     
  15. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,523
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
    A side doe? You sound ignorant as **** scuba Fury..