@drenlou I don't get how you and @Pimp C think GGG is ducking Charlo when Charlo himself says that the one who ducked him was Canelo.
I never used the word ducking.. I'm talking about why they're demanding their mando to fight Jacobs yet express interest in a Murata fight? It doesn't make sense to me..
Derevyanchenko has been IBF mandatory longer with him and Murata both being more deserving than Charlo. Get in line.
Impossible! But there's a test to determine the truth of that statement Which cartoon series accurately predicted that Trump would become the POTUS? You have 60 seconds!
No. Hence I don't agree with Charlo there. But the plain fact is that Golovkin has three mandos right now: Charlo, Derevyanchenko, and Murata plus the contractual obligation to fight Canelo next. None of the mandos have yet been enforced so all are meaningless.
And I'd like to see Canelo, then Saunders, then whoever out of Charlo, Dere and Murata. At this rate Jacobs is never getting his rematch
Yes, exactly. If Canelo doesn't want the immediate rematch and Golovkin chooses to fight someone else (apart from BJS/Lemiuex to become undisputed as unification trumps mando) I'd be unhappy with him too and advocate stripping. But: 1) This Murata talk is all after the WBC mandatory has been fulfilled. No relation to Charlo. 2) Unless Canelo pulls out, Golovkin has no chance to fight Charlo in the near future. Besides Derevyanchenko might get enforced first.