That doesn't mean anything. Groves is legit and far , far more proven at 168 than Eubank Jr is. Whose going to win that fight? Eggington is more proven at 147 than Crawford is. Does that mean you'd rather see him fight Spence and Thurman before Crawford? Its pretty obvious that Charlo is going to be a major player at 160. GGG fans should be wanting their guy in there against him as soon possible before he gets better. Or else there are putting him at the back of the que in hopes that Golovkin misses out on him.
Very extremely poor comparisons. Ffs Crawford has iced top tier talent @ 140 and Egginton just lost to mimoune, hell why did you use that. Jr's resume isn't too bad tbh his best win is not a world away from Groves. Still plenty think Groves will stomp him and this is a huge breakthrough fight for Jr which he could lose and his hype will die too. Charlo arguably lost to Trout ffs, Hurd bashed Trout from pillar to post and stopped him and people are still calling Hurd a bum? And yes it should make all the difference as to who should be next. Resume, titles and money all count and Murata has all 3, Charlo only has a ko of JGlass ffs, Hurd will kill JGlass. Murata is very capable of dominating Charlo, Murata is also an Olympic gold medalist and huge draw in Japan.