GGG looked like over 30 Hagler, he went to pure brutality because his reflexes are cooked (as Freddie Roach said against Monroe; "he took punches to make it a better fight? That's such bull****!) Brook will be a solid, not great, 154. He could win or lose against the other champs.
Kell was faster, which made GGG look slow. Kell was able to land some combos and make GGG miss because he was the faster man. GGG was brilliant to go brutal on Kell. The judges were giving rounds to Kell because he was looking better than they expected him to look. Hager/Leonard was misjudged for the same reason and look what happened to Hagler. GGG won every round if you watch that fight knowing the outcome, the 2nd I initially gave to Brook, but that was the round GGG did the most damage by breaking Kell's face. Sometimes it's better to get the work in vs. looking pretty, especially when you risk the judges scoring the fight for the guy that only beat expectations.
Since I haven't told her about it I wouldn't know, and she doesn't know a goddamn thing about the internet so it wouldn't matter anyway. You're a crap poster and do nothing but make passive aggressive anti-EE troll threads but you fly under the radar because you post infrequently.
If Golovkin is over-the-hill, then their are a lot of boxers who would love to be over-the-hill................
Where did all the "Brook will destroy GGG" threads go. Now we get the "GGG isn't that good and Brook was too small" threads. Yawn...
Good one, Ace! (nah, it really wasn't but after riding that short bus to school for 8 years I'll give you a little encouragement).
