GGG's Punchstats were Padded

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TheyDontBoxNoMore7, Sep 19, 2017.


  1. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    G just walked forward and threw punches. Canelo set up the most traps. Canelo was the superior counterpuncher. Canelo landed the best shots. Canelo was the more superior defensive fighter. Canelo even when he did stand toe to toe delivered the better combinations and won the exchange when he wanted to.

    G did not cut off the ring pin Canelo to the ropes. For the vast majority of the fight, Canelo went to the ropes and left the ropes on his own accord lmao

    As Freddy said, the only astounding number of shots that were credited for G was glancing, putty pat jabs that were mostly blocked or slipped. I didn't see Canelo's head snap back much at all.

    Ring generalship doesn't go to the guy whose ineffectively being aggressive. This is the hardest lesson casuals and even people who have been watching boxing for a decent time grasp.

    Canelo was just as much effective on the back foot as G was coming forward. Freddywak even posts a video showcasing that he thinks it's lame when guys are only limited to a jab which G was while other opponent is landing with a wider range of variety such as body shots which Canelo did.

    Please stop. Freddy isn't even ****ing with you lmao
     
    IsaL and JeremyCorbyn like this.
  2. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    I disagree that punch stats were inflated for both boxers. Here's why : first of all most everyone agrees that Canelo landed by far the cleaner bigger more flush punches. It's easier to tell whether punches like the ones Canelo were landing in fact landed then the glancing, partly blocked pressure punches that Triple G may have landed. Canelo was landing more of the clean "easy to tell if they landed" punches vs the majority that G was throwing. So just based on that alone, inherently the punches G landed are going to be more error prone as far as seeing what landed and what didn’t. Most of Canelo’s punches were more easier to see. We know for a fact that Canelo is more elusive, has tighter defense, etc, so what’s landing on him is naturally going to be harder to determine than what landed on Triple G.

    Further, based on the live punch stat overlays during the match, the only discrepancies we can observe are G being given credit for punches that he didn’t actually land. We have as far as I can tell no evidence of Canelo’s stats being inflated.
     
  3. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Precisely. Now these guys want to act like before this thread, they weren't using punchstats as a key argument for G winning. Throw it back in their and now of course punch stats aren't reliable.

    I did nothing of the sort of requesting watch in slow motion or with sound off and I'm already being accused of making conspiracy theories and being worse than a *******.

    These guys are in such denial it's not even funny. The rematch ends this bs saga for good. I can't wait.
     
    JeremyCorbyn and shadow111 like this.
  4. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Nobody cares about that clown. He knows who to target and he edits his videos to cater to his target audience which are always victims like Manny/Kov and now G. I can post proof right now of punches he doesn't count which I did spit in the first couple of minutes and nobody would care anyways. That guy is a joke but I don't knock his hustle at all.
     
  5. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    The **** is ridiculous, such clear denial, there's a lot of deflection going on here so as to not address your very astute observation which can easily be verified. It's convienient for G fans to come on here with the "punch stats are unrealiable" argument now that there's clear evidence of Triple G punch inflation lol. And like I said to KiwiMan, I agree with him about Compubox not being trustwrothy, it's not like what he said was wrong, but it's just so convienient to say that now that we have the evidence showing G getting credit for punches he didn't land.

    We're kind of stuck between a rock in a hard place, because while I don't like using punch stats to justify who is scoring or who is winning a round, the fact is that Canelo having that punch stat lead in the 5th, a round that pretty much everybody gave to G, it's a bit eye opening in the sense that G is known to be the volume puncher, and Canelo is known as the guy who picks his spots and lands the cleaner punches. Generally the guy that lands the cleaner punches particularly as a counter puncher is the guy that usually is outlanded via punch stats. So as much as I dislike using punch stats to suggest someone won a round, the fact that Canelo was leading by 4-5 punches in that round via live punch stats is quite interesting to me.
     
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 likes this.
  6. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,398
    14,571
    Feb 28, 2016
    I don't mind that, you have a point and you argue it clearly and respectfully.

    What my #1 complaint is that @TheyDontBoxNoMore7 wrote 3 untruths about me, clearly documented in post 179, and refuses to apologize or withdraw them.
     
  7. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Very good post and honest.
     
  8. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    You still have not given me your rounds. That accounts for 2 of your three accusations of me telling lies. I had more respect for you bro. I should've known what you were about when you abandoned your Parker avy the minute he caught **** from people on this board. My character has far more integrity than you. I'm not a wishy walshy bum and I go down with my ship. So unless you're finally going to actually entertain me with your rounds already (day 3 I believe), kindly screw off bro.
     
  9. JeremyCorbyn

    JeremyCorbyn Active Member Full Member

    742
    776
    Jul 15, 2017
    Clearly the reason they don't show the punch stats live on screen throughout the whole fight is because then everyone would be able to see that they are complete and utter BS.

    This means the TV companies are complicit too, they absolutely know they aren't accurate, yet they show them anyway. The question is why show them at all? Is it just for entertainment purposes, a fluff piece? Or is it something more sinister, such as... they want to represent a false narrative of the fight?
     
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 likes this.
  10. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    6,372
    5,462
    Aug 10, 2015
    You have zero integrity you clown. You bashed Marciano and Calzaghe calling them hypejobs because "they beat old men" yet you were enamored with Joshua after he beat a 41 year old shot Klitschko and called him the future of HW division. The fighters' concentration of melanin clearly plays a role here. KiwiMan is one of the most respected posters on this board, while you are nothing but a black panther moron pushing his racial agenda.
     
    JohnnyDrama99 and mirkofilipovic like this.
  11. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    And you follow me around like a stan all day. So how pathetic does that make you. People have more respect for G over Canelo but they still pay Canelo more money when he fights. Why is this? Why would I care about the respect of bums who don't support me. You're my right nut and I favor haters more (which I have more of) than people who like me because it means I'm more effective and successful with my points and views.
     
  12. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,350
    Mar 11, 2016
    No....you're just a closed minded, stubborn moron who thinks posting like a spoiled high school girl makes him sound cool. You'll say all the same stuff when 3G beats Canelo again...troll..
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  13. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    903
    Nov 24, 2012
    Tell me you aren't that simple? Of course Alvarez set the most traps. He was constantly in retreat and on the move which provides the opportunities to lay traps. GGG had no problems providing the opportunities by throwing punches. Sheesh....captain obvious. Again, counter punching is reactive knucklehead. GGG maintained applying pressure letting his hands go freely so of course that allowed Alvarez counter punching opportunities. This is too easy.

    Canelo was defensive the entire fight yet he landed at a similar connect percentage as GGG. So you can argue he was slightly better defensively, but not worth wasting the oxygen it takes to argue that point. You need to keep as much oxygen as possible to keep the few brain cells you have, alive.

    Nelo had success standing toe to toe sometimes. More success than he did back peddling that's for sure, yet constantly retreating was the strategy he went with for 95% of the fight. Bad decision....or it was a conscious decision based on something he felt inside the ring with GGG that no one else was experiencing on the other side of those punches.

    Of course ring generalship doesn't go with the guy who is ineffective with his aggression. Don't be so dense....Landing more punches, landing within 2% of the compared connect percentages and consistency in waking your opponent down over 12 rounds is more than enough to be the ring general. That's why GGG won the fight.

    Again....if all the punches from Golovkin were "pitty pat" punches and weren't affecting Alvarez the question becomes "why didn't Canelo just walk through those punches and walk GGG down"?

    He could have made the fight easy if he just fought the way he did against Khan, Kirkland or Liam if the offense of GGG really wasn't effective. I know it's hard, but sometimes a little critical thinking can help....in this case it's merely just common sense but I don't believe either are a possibility for you.

    I've known Freddy since east side boxing and respect his opinion. But we don't agree on everything. Do yourself a favor and stop d!ck riding. You're embarrassing yourself
     
  14. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Ban bet on the rematch?
     
  15. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    6,372
    5,462
    Aug 10, 2015
    Your usual points and views are like this "black boxers = the best, white boxers = hypejobs" period. That is how complicated your thought process is. I do have big respect for both Golovkin and Alvarez. I briefly disliked Alvarez after he vacated his belt, but it is all gone after he stepped in the ring with Golovkin and performed well. More people buy Canelo's fights maybe because there are 36 million Mexican-Americans, don't you think so, genius? I don't see any other reason why the Chavez Jr fight had so many PPV buys, it was a total mismatch.