[GIF] One of my favorite Marciano knockouts

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Apr 14, 2016.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Round one against Savold.

    Case closed.
     
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Which punch?
     
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Savold was an unusually very sloppy Marciano win. Rocky was very cute in there at his best and unfortunately he never gets credit for it. He did far more defensively than Frazier as an example. Rocky was constantly sliding in and out while Bobbing and weaving, blocking, partying, slipping and then countering. In comparison Frazier had a repetitive much more easily times defense.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Oh ,just look at the film:patsch
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Falling over through missing is a momentum thing more than a balance thing. Everybody misses. Some fighters punch with a whole lot more momentum behind them. Throwing themselves entirely into a punch is a gamble.

    Floyd Patterson leaped all over the place. Unsurprisingly Floyd threw himself over too when he missed. Did patterson have bad balance too?
     
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I've seen it many times. We've made it this far, all you have to do now is point out the punch he misses by 2 feet.
     
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    In a conventional sense Rocky was awful. I think this is what people can't get past. They look at him and see what appears to be the wildness and cannot entertain this at all in an ATG regard. It must be a poor era, old small men etc etc

    If this was true even the power and durability would not be enough but still they rationalise even this point and decide only a poor era could explain such dominance.

    I think the truth is Rockys style, what is seen as technical flaws, all worked for him in a completely unconventional way. I think it's easier to accept that this Rocky was a one off, an unconventionally effective fighter of real talent and substance who knew what he was doing. He just did not do it in the conventionally aesthetic way that looks smooth or as pleasing to the eye.

    He was a great fighter because it worked for him. Rocky had undeniable success of the highest possible echelon. He just does not look like what is most people's idea of a great fighter.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Emmanuel Steward must have got it wrong then.:think
     
  9. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    Why, what did he say?
    I think Choklab's post is pretty accurate. If Marciano was as bad as some on here are saying he would never have been able to land so many punches on class fighters like Charles and Moore(irrespective of their age).

    He must have had adequate footwork or it would not have been possible to hit them given his short reach.
     
  10. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,495
    7,260
    May 18, 2006
    Wouldn't be the first time. Great trainer and ****yst though he was but he wasn't infallible either...no one is.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yeah Rocky was extremely hard to hit.
    This is him the morning after his fight against 37 years old Louis.

    This content is protected
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    When I met Emmanuel Steward at a dinner show (he was on tour with Thomas Hearnes) he said his proudest achievement was what he was able to do with Dennis Andries -an awkward and unconventionally successful fighter himself. It dosnt stop a fighter being effective if they maintain crude elements. Even after Stewards influence Andries never boxed like a traditional Kronk fighter did he? And yet Steward was proud of how he was able to utilize what already worked and make it better.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Which still didn't transform Andries into a polished boxer , with defensive skills , he remained a crude ,strong, awkward , mauler. We aren't discussing effectiveness, we are examining claims that Marciano was defensively adept and possessed good balance,neither is true.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,816
    44,483
    Apr 27, 2005
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    He said Marciano fought old ,past it men,that he was too small ,too slow, and had poor balance.