Although Ward is about two classes below Louis in this regard, I've definitely noticed the similarity.
He isn't as fast on his feet, or with his hands , does not have the balance or the co-ordination of either of those two, nor the fluidity of combinations nor the reflexes. . Really you shouldn't need to ask why here.
And they don't have his pacing, stamina, upper body mobility, or strong legs. Still optimized as an athletic power puncher, especially compared to Galento.
Marciano was not in Dempsey's class for upper body mobility and Louis fought in an entirely different style.Galento has as much to do with this thread as O J Simpson! This is a silly argument and singularly unproductive because you are going make ever more outlandish statements as your argument collapses of its own volition.So I'm bailing here. You really do have a problem with arguments to the contrary!
I didn't bring up Galento, Seamus did. I believe my argument is sound. Just seems like you are collapsing under your own ego and frustration.
There are no optimal bodily proportions for a "power punching boxer". Punching power is about technique and timing and something in the act of throwing the punch. Power punchers come in all shapes and sizes. There's nothing freakish or unusual in Joe Louis's body type among heavyweight boxers. He has a good athlete's physique. He actually looks very good, aesthetic, well-balanced. "Freakish" would be Primo Carnera, or Sonny Liston's long arms and huge hands, Tyson's neck and sheer stockiness, or Bob Fitzsimmons's top-heavy-back-heavy frame.
When you throw correct power punches, and are gifted at it, theres no reason to think your body won't form a shape around it. Fitz is a freak but Louis isn't? Your criteria seems weird. Louis arms neck and shoulders, again, look abnormally large in relation to his torso, and the rest of his body. You can't get that physique from strength and conditioning, you get it from being the best mule puncher of all times.