[GIF] Primo Carnera uses his size jab, but then Max Baer turns into a savage (HD)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Mar 31, 2017.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Hard sharp jabs.
    Powerful straight right that he can throw from the shoulder without telegraphing.
    He is vey good at measuring distance and keeping people off his 85" reach.

    His super fiber twitch muscles help him punch from serendipitous high strength low resilience aerodynamic speed. (I made that one up to poke fun at modernistas.)

    He knows how to use his weight in the clinch.
    His mobility is fast for his size.

    Hes good at closing the ring down and delivering damage in hard combos.
     
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I assure you I would not.

    No, the thing is--we don't have to view these short clips and highlights in a vacuum. We can compare the action in the clip to other things we know about these fighters, other fights we've seen, etc.

    I'm only critiquing the clip that you hand-selected for us. You're acting like I went out and cherry-picked this clip and then posted it to rag on Baer. And as I explained above, my assessment of Baer is certainly not based solely on your clip.

    With all due respect, at the very least you seem to discard any respect for the principles of boxing technique whenever those principles come in tension with your exaltation of fundamentally flawed old school fighters. You take on this relativist perspective that ultimately becomes completely circular (i.e. because Max Baer was able to have a very distinguished career using the technique in question, the technique therefore cannot be flawed).

    I would be interested in hearing more about your time in the gym though (sincerely). Has it changed your perspective on any of the tactical and technical points many of us have debated in the past?

    Depends what you mean by "slicksters." I certainly prefer them to punchers though, and I admit my bias there. But some of my favorite boxers, though technically sound, would hardly be considered slicksters.
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    primo reminds me more of vitali than wlad.

    if anything he combines the best abilities of both K bros, but without their weaknesses.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I see more or less the exact same thing, though I'm not sure that his chin is really all that bad (after all, he took a decent amount of punishment before succumbing to Louis).
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,565
    21,929
    Sep 15, 2009
    Any avoidance of an attack is a good defence. Hitting someone hard enough that they think twice about hitting you back is a good defence as well. A defence only needs to be as good as is required to win a fight.

    I don't know how highly you rate Carnera. I don't bother rating him at all tbh. But no matter how Carnera is rated, no matter how low anyone is rated, if they don't mount an effective attack then your defence has done it's job.

    Modern fans, strange label that. Not sure what a modern fan is, surely every boxing fan posting now is around in the modern era therefore is a modern fan. I'm not sure if Bowe is miles ahead of Baer in terms of defence. Neither utilised sharp or slick defensive maneuovres, they defended in a subtle way that was more about minimising damage and leaving them in position to fire back with power shots. Defending with their chin, taking one to give one and whatever label fits.

    That aside, both also managed to combine their skills to defeat the reigning HW champion and both did it as underdogs.

    Mayweather isn't known for trading up close, but the way he dismantled Hatton in the pocket suggests to me his offensive abilities are more than advertised. Whitaker is not known for his crushing power but the way he forced the action against Hurtado suggests he had more sting when he wanted to use it.

    A lot of elite level boxers are more well rounded then given credit for, they just specialised in other areas which led to more emphasis being placed on them.

    Will Baer ever be considered a defensive wizard? Of course not. But the defensive skills he did have led to him spending a time as the best HW on the planet.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,565
    21,929
    Sep 15, 2009
    Lol
     
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    That's not my point.
    My point is you will always justify a good display of boxing from an old timer by criticizing the opponent. Whether it's Louis, Max Baer, or many other slew of lineal champions. I can't recall a single time you've done the opposite, and had something good to say


    U wot?
    You said his technique in that clip was terrible.
    I asked if you want me to find James Toney do the same thing.
    Your response doesn't follow the conversation.


    No I don't, and I don't need to, because those fighters are not fundamentally flawed.
    I believe your idea of fundamentals are tied to only one style set.

    You think I practice fundamentals by day, and disparage them by night? Cmon

    I absolutely have learned a lot. I still have a lot to learn.
    I have much keener sense of what I'm looking at when watching boxing.

    The more experience I get, the more I agree with janitors opinions tbh.
     
    Mr.DagoWop likes this.
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Louis did not find him to be particularly strong, in fact it was him manhandling Carnera, not the other way around.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think you are both correct to some degree. Baer was following the long accepted tenet of tucking your chin down into your shoulder to protect it, but Baer was always susceptible to the jab ,as both Loughran and Braddock demonstrated.
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I'd bet a lot of money that you routinely ignore or even celebrate tactics and techniques on this forum that would get you criticized or laughed at by the trainers and pros in your gym.


    Have you ever disagreed with Janitor on anything?
     
  11. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Oh, is that all? Lol He got outboxed by LHWs. When was the last time that ever happened to Klischko?
     
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Ok. If you're convinced I'm Satan there is nothing I can do about that. Let alone your assumptions on my understanding of boxing, who laughs at me, etc. I've never been laughed at by anyone in my gym. To my knowledge.

    Have you boxed? Can I take a turn to ask you about your experience?

    I rarely disagree with janitor. His answers are thoughtful, wise, and he rarely uses glib extremes.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2017
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Never suggested that you were Satan or that anyone at your gym laughs at you. What I said was, I bet that the experienced fighters and trainers at your gym would share my criticisms of some of the tactics and techniques exhibited by older fighters in the various gifs and videos that get debated on this forum.

    I don't have much personal experience. But I've trained in a couple of gyms (mainly) with two pro trainers, and each were sticklers for certain modern conventions wrt technique, with me and their more experienced/serious fighters, and highly critical of even fairly minor lapses in form and execution. My limited personal experience, combined with everything else I've gleaned about the sport over the years, makes it impossible for me to fathom that many of the professionals in your gym would share your views about the things we've debated in this forum.
     
  14. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Lots of guys in my gym look up to the old school fighters.

    Of course your coach is a stickler for technique. That's what trainers do. It's not a modern phenomenon.
    The problem is you point out technique lapses that aren't there.

    Imagine in 50 years, posting many clips of fighters like Peters, Klitschko, Mayweather, etc.
    And when you post a clip of Peters knocking down Wlad, they only point out what Wlad was doing wrong. Holding the wrong way, using the wrong balance, turning his head away, not covering up, etc. And imagine if that is the case for every single clip you post. Yeah, think about that.

    Again, there are tons of different styles in my gym. I've sparred guys who hold their hand to their body, covering their body, so that they can focus on head movement for defense and countering. They know what they're doing, and they aren't much easier to hit than guys who put their hands up.

    When I first asked to join the gym, the head trainer told me to start with the beginner classes. But I insisted on having a chance at the open gym (in hindsight I was way over my head lol, I didn't realize there were pros and a champion. But he smiled and gave me a chance). After working out that day, he welcomed me to come train as much as possible. He says I hit like a bleeping mule. And he is developing me differently than the slickster for instance, who has beautiful head movement and countering but little power. And he trains me differently than the swarmer.

    I see him giving different advice to different fighters based on their styles.

    I mean if boxing has taught us anything, it's not to be singularly minded when it comes to which techniques work. It could come down to something as simple as the pronation of the arches in your feet, and how that manifests into your form and balance. Mayweather can't fight like Rocky and vice versa. But they can both be wildly successful.

    It sounds like you were pure raw when you joined a gym. So every little thing was taught to you by someone else. So for you that is the only way. I get it. But it's different for many people. Lomachenko didn't invent his style from a trainer at the gym, he developed it through the unique experiences he had taking dance classes his father signed him up for, later applying it in boxing. And that turned out to be an incredibly helpful and unique formula.
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2017
    escudo likes this.
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    @reznick -- FYI, I think this was my only commentary on Carnera's chin.