Gift decisions

Agrees with Randall out boxing Chavez.

 

Your logic is completely flawed. There are 4 ways to win a fight. KO,T.K.O, DQ, and decsion. There were no KD's and no one should have been DQ'd, that only leaves a decision. When you're judging a fight it is done on a round by round basis. There are various criteria for judging a fight. One criteria never used is, who the champ is. A judge cannot sit there and say "Fighter A won the round by a slight margin according to the criterea used, but fighter B is the champ, so I'll give the round to fighter B". It doesn't work this way.

 

Everybody and Hopkins knows that if he pressured JT anymore than he did he would have been hurt or TKO'd. This explains the way that he fought. Don't make excuses for him because it was up to him to make it happen.

 

Man, you are making too much sense. Stop it already.

 

Chavez vs Sweet is bigger in my opinion, because of status.

 

Always with the conspiracy theories.:-( Aren't you needed at ground Zero with the rest of the 9-11 conspiracy nut jobs? Winky did not beat Taylor. That fight was a draw if I ever saw one.:thumbsup

 

Allan Green vs Emmett Linton was a hose job from hell. Green lost that fight if you own a set of eyeballs.

 

Many of these so called gift decisions come up only as a matter of the skewed perceptions of some.

Such as Chavez-Whitaker, DLH-Quartey, and many others, only a handful and mostly haters and nuthuggers present these.

Besides that there are many true shameless robberies such as in Demetrius Hopkins fight against Forbes where almost everybody saw right through that.

 

Hopkins didnt start to fight until the 9th round TWICE against Taylor.How people consider those fights a robbery is beyond me.

 

:thumbsup

 

Lol thanks it is sad how bad biased american commentry can create such a long standing myth.

 

**** man I must have been smoking some good stuff if you guys are truely saying that Chavez won that fight fair and square. I'll look it over but from what I remember I had Swea up by two rounds. Though now that I think about it, it was not sinfully contraversial.

 

Lol I had Chavez by one round, though it would heen by two or three if pea had had the points taken off for his fouls!
Despite that scoring the fight one round in favour of pea I can completely understand.

 

I own a set of eye balls, two of them acutally(I wear contacts). I saw that fight, and it was not a hose job. Linton made it interesting, and you could make an argument that he won, but no hose job.

 

De La Hoya vs Sturm

Hopkins vs Taylor 1

Winky vs Taylor

Chavez vs Whitaker