Gift decisions

There's no such thing as gift decission. It's ONLY a term being used by the agitated delussional fans when the result of a close fight doesn't matched their expectations.

:rofl

. . . but I do believe in ROBBERIES . . . it's the case of a fight going to the clearly losing fighter.


:good

 

If by "schooled" you mean he ran from him like a schoolgirl running from Mark Chamura then yes.

 

And he still managed to outland chavez!! 10 rounds to 2 Pernell Whitaker. End of story

 

No we mean that he outlanded him and made him look silly.

 

He ran like a little rabbit, there was no fight to score. . . just a chase scene.

 

What do you think the punchstat was on Chavez hitting air molecules?

 

Chavez – Whitaker

Round 1
10-9 Chavez

Round 2
10-9

Round 3
9-10

Round 4
10-9

Round 5
10-9

Round 6
10-9

Round 7
9-10

Round 8
9-10

Round 9
10-9

Round 10
9-10

Round 11
9-10

Round 12
10-9

 

Clean punching and ring generalship - Sweet Pea
Effective aggression - Not Chavez that night

If you score the fight right, Pernell won...BOTTOM LINE

 

Another tool on ESB

 

3/7:hi: door to your left

 

7-5 Chavez?atsch

 

I could ask you the exact same thing.

 

a lot easier to throw insults around that produce cards and argue them intelligently:good

 

there was no fight to score, Pernell simply ran from him. . . never even tried to hurt him. Chavez couldnt catch him, the draw was appropriate since nothing happened.

 

Lol my bad had him by two thought there was a 10 all round in theiratsch
while since I have looked at it but as I say one or two rounds either way is fine.
What annoys me is the false idea that sweet pea somehow dominated chavez, which is completely untrue the commentary is the worst I think I have ever heard in afight.
Also there was a lot of fouling against Chavez, and I think he would beat whitaker at least 7 out of 10 tiems prime for prime especially with a fair ref