Gil Clancy's Views of Carlos Monzon

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sugarsean, Mar 27, 2011.


  1. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Monzon, in my long held opinion, would have been poison for Robinson and would have decisioned him ...15 round decision...if rematched, he'd have decisioned him again.
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Monzon is unknowable to most doubting fight fans...his style..his entire demeanor..especially the aforementioned "shark eyes"..was inscrutable. His damned record..his career speaks for itself. He was the best middleweight champion of all.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,828
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: no. That's not my assertion at all. If you want to find my assertions about Monzon head to head you can find another post describing exactly that in this thread.

    Really? That's interesting. Certainly Burley would be the fastest fighter Monzon had faced of hand and foot. He lashes very hard punches across three different planes which led to a sensational record against stand up boxers. He attacked very very quickly with a judge for distance that seems to be as good as Monzon's who he also matches for reach.

    Basically, I feel the exact opposite. As far as styles go, I think Burley is to be favoured.

    :lol: none taken, as i've told you three times now it's not my list, although I kind of wish it was now.
     
  4. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Seamus loves to take things out of context and go on a tirade. No offense but he does it a lot.
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,133
    53,517
    Feb 11, 2005
    My tirades are second to none and worth the price of admission, in or out of context.
     
  6. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005
    Monzon is pretty overrated by some. But he still kicks the living **** out of Jones who is so overrated by brainless children of the nineties it isnt even funny.
     
  7. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    :rofl

    Cheers for all that Mr. Shakespeare.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,696
    30,598
    Jun 2, 2006
    Monzon's style turns me off,but he was undeniably effective.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,828
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, good writer writing well about fighters, I can see why you'd be in hysterics :roll:
     
  10. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    More because he seems to be basing his evaluation of Monzon on how his eyes looked.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,828
    Mar 21, 2007
    Very Shakespearian.
     
  12. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005
    He was definately effective. The one area hes underrated is his defense. The guy was like gumby, he would bend that long waiste of his in all these weird directions and it would be very difficult to hit him.
     
  13. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    29
    Nov 15, 2009
    smack him
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    :lol::lol:

    He had great control of distance didnt he?
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,133
    53,517
    Feb 11, 2005
    on the fanny, please.