Given their style, which fighter would be unbeatable if you could add an attribute?

also give cotto even more power.....so his opponents can actually die in the ring

 

Valuev with handspeed (ala Pacman handspeed).

 

i agree... as ridiculous as it may sound, i've always thought that if pea had power, he would've been the greatest fighter in the history of the sport

 

That wouldn't be fair.

 

Idiocy

"Don't say Calzaghe with power because he would change his style"

Pavlik with handspeed, wouldn't he throw more in volume and attempt to hit more rather than sit down?

 

Kessler: Money - to give him homeadvantage in the big fights.

 

Yeah, that would be scary.

Valuev with a Tyson'ish left hook.

:scaredas:

 

:yikes That would be scary. Being that elusive and accurate with julian jackson like power!

 

If you could add what a fighter was missing then thier would only be one style in boxing. As I have heard thoughtout this thread, adding a skill to a fighter it would change their style. If you gave Whitaker power then he wouldnt have been the wiz that he was.

 

Roy Jones (immortality from the age of 26)

 

The fact that every fighter has something missing is what keeps us intrigued.

For instance Joe Calzaghe had great power prior to the troubles with his hands, but he was fighting at domestic level so the stat of 22 wins (21KO's) prior to Eubank may have been misleading - but he would have adapted his style to work around the hand trouble.

 

Hearns with a solid chin

whitaker with power is simply scary as hell

 

Andre Berto with an extra 6 inches and 60 pounds.... so he can clean out the heavyweight division

 

but you said at the start of this thread you would add hand speed to pavlik in addition to his power AND THE AMOUNT OF PUNCHES HE THROWS.

your an idiot cos thats the same thing as this guy said bout calzaghe. he has the hand speed and pavlik has the power. so your both adding the other fighters attribute to your chosen fighter.

 

hearns with chin is ****n unstopable...