Glass Ceilings of Eddie Machen and Zora Folley?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Alpha_trooper818, May 31, 2024.


  1. Alpha_trooper818

    Alpha_trooper818 New Member Full Member

    14
    19
    Apr 27, 2022
    These two men are highly touted in my opinion for remaining as strong contenders for several years past their best regardless of any belts won. That being said, as good as these men were they never are described as greats (perhaps great contenders).

    What was it about each of their fighting styles (or lack thereof), that held them back as fighters? It is not just limited to fighting styles, external factors like personal issues or managing issues can be included if any of you are aware. Looking forward to the discussion.
     
    Fireman Fred likes this.
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,598
    9,180
    Oct 8, 2013
    In the case of Machen I think it could be said his prime was beaten out of him by Ingo and a horrible referee. I have a boxing magazine from I guess 1956 I would have to go looking for it, it’s in the wake of Rocky’s retirement. An in depth and long article is written on Machen early in his career that is extremely favorable. Apparently in this write up he was viewed as the lead talent and heir to Marciano as a champion.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,662
    14,033
    Jan 4, 2008
    During their time I think the interest was limited for more than one black fighter at the top. Black champions defending against black contenders probably didn't make very much money.

    But most of the time, there were better contenders about. Simple as that. Their window was in 1958, when Patterson gave them a pass. After that both were eliminated from contention by Liston, and when he was done with Patterson they were on the slide, especially Machen, and Clay the new top contender.

    Rematch clauses and few title fights (often only one per year) certainly didn't help their cause. Folley had to stay relevant for a decade to finally get his shot, but that's of course hard to do.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2024
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,699
    30,596
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good Post!
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,662
    14,033
    Jan 4, 2008
    It should also be said about these guys that they had to go on the road to fight their opponents. Who knows how Folley's decision loss to Cooper (which he would avenged with a KO), draw with Mildenberger and MD loss to Bonavena (rematch, Folley won the first) would have turned out had they been in his home town instead of theirs?

    Back then, if you were black and had no amateur pedigree and backing like Patterson and Clay, you had to really stand out and they never managed to do that.
     
  6. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,116
    6,168
    Jan 6, 2024
    They might have had alphabet belts in the modern era they were top 5 guys for a long time and those type of guys tend to win belt nowadays. The period between 1950 and 1965 was the hardest period to get a title shot at HW other than the world wars. But both were only the clear cut number one contender for less than a year before losing to Johansson and Liston respectively. Folley was 3-1-1 in non title 12 rounders and Machen was 1-4-1. To Machens credit Ali credited Machen for him figuring Liston out and he put forth a noble effort.

    I would put them in the HOF but I am more easygoing with that. They are borderline top 5 guys for that 1955-1965 era.

    They were average sized fighters with less than a 60% KO rate. When their careers started that was not at all a problem by the time their careers ended it absolutley was. Enter Muhammad Ali and Ernie Terrell who they had their title shots against when the guy they were trying to beat in the beginning was Patterson.
     
  7. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,521
    21,591
    Jul 30, 2014
    I believe Folley getting his title shot, like Williams was based more on his past work, than anything he was doing at the time. Ali seemed to have been giving out title shots to those he perceived to have earned one, yet never received them.
     
    KasimirKid and Bokaj like this.
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,662
    14,033
    Jan 4, 2008
    Folley had a good run after the Terrell loss, but his best wins of that run (like Chuvalo) were a few years before the Ali fight, yeah. But he was ranked first or second by The Ring, much because Ali had been cleaning house of course, so he was a pretty logical choice and I think he gave a very good account of himself.

    Williams's reflexes were shot to ****, but Folley still looked sharp. Next to Mildenberger, he probably gave the best account of himself of all Ali's challengers during that reign, so he showed himself to be much more than a nostalgic charity challenge.

    Let's also not forget that he the year after took Bonavena to an MD in Buenos Aires.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2024
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  9. SolomonDeedes

    SolomonDeedes Active Member Full Member

    1,477
    2,369
    Nov 15, 2011
    True, and according to the Associated Press Folley "outclassed the wild-swinging Bonavena most of the time" and many in Bonavena's hometown crowd booed the decision.

    https://ibb.co/YDL6mJP
     
    swagdelfadeel and Bokaj like this.
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,662
    14,033
    Jan 4, 2008
    Thanks for the find!

    Yeah, being the hometown fighter or not can really make a difference to a fighter's resume. Take Usyk for example. If the Briedis, AJ 2 and Fury fight really had been close, he'd be 0-3 against them and his legacy would be very different.

    When you're the away fighter you often have to win clearly to get the decision, and even that isn't always enough.