No he didn't, he lost to Tarver but got the decision. Even if he did win, Tarver is a bum who's only claim to fame was beating a shot, overaggressive Roy Jones jr
Bernard Hopkins, Sven Ottke, Roy Jones Jr., Antonio Tarver, Chad Dawson, Allan Green, Carl Froch, Lucian Bute...
It's not about who you fight because if you've got decent management, you can fight all the biggest fighters in the world. It's about who you beat. But anyway let me show you why you're wrong. He lost to Bernard Hopkins. Roy Jones jr was shot and completely gunshy from being knocked down by Antonio Tarver so therefore I don't even count that, anybody could have beaten Roy Jones jr that night. Tarver was a bum who's only claim to fame was beating a shot, overaggressive Roy Jones jr and he didn't even beat Tarver, he lost but got the decision. Why do you even mention Chad Dawson? Glen Johnson clearly lost against him? Why does losing make him so great?
You deserve a homosexual son and a daughter who has sex outside of marriage, you Glen Johnson hater. He was old as **** when fighting Chad Dawson and still did well. He was also old against Bute, Froch, etc. But he remained a force to be reckoned with, even though he was never the best.
I would have nothing against having a homosexual son seeing as I'm not a homophobe. And if my daughter had sex outside of marriage, that would be her decision. I think you need to work on your insults
His win over Jones is one of the most underrated wins on here. In my opinion, he deserves a lot of credit for beating a near prime Jones
See Dr. Larry? These are the people that agree with you, trolls. Knockout artist knows that Roy Jones jr was the best fighter of all time when he was in his prime and also know that anytime after the John Ruiz fight Roy Jones jr was completely shot. Yet he pretend to have the same opinion as you just to get a rise out of people. That should show you how messed up your way of thinking is Larry
Anytime after the Ruiz fight? He recorded probably his third best win after Ruiz in Tarver! He was LHW Champ and still ranked P4P, that's not a shot fighter you idiot. This is revisionism, going into the Johnson fight, most thought Jones would breeze past him to set up the Tarver rematch, not many gave Johnson any hope, I think he was 9/1 to knock Jones out. Glen turned in the best performance of his career, and beat a near prime Roy Jones fair and square, Johnson deserves a lot of respect.
Uh, what? You do realize that Glen Johnson was a world champion right? A guy who beat RJJ, Tarver, Woods, Griffin, and so forth. I don't think that places him as a 'durable test.'