God save the queen.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Siney, May 26, 2013.


  1. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    You are so, so predictable you're almost like a caricature. I knew you'd take issue with Jonny's post about the royals. I wouldn't be surprised if you are also fat, have poor hygiene, your favorite food is pie and mash and your fantasy threesome is with the queen and maggie thatcher. How funny would that be. Was it you that also took issue with Tyson Fury's song choice for his last fight?
     
  2. JonnyBGoode

    JonnyBGoode Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,118
    1
    Sep 30, 2011
    The Queen only lives at Buckingham Palace about 50 days of the year and apparently hates it there, could have that thing turned into a hotel/museum and charge an absolute bomb, if they're to benefit us by bringing in all these tourists then why aren't we maximising this revenue? If their only benefit is to promote tourism then why do we send Prince Philip around the world insulting people? Calling chinese people "slitty eyed" and asking aboriginies if they still "throw spears at each other" ?

    Then we have Harry dressing up as a nazi, pretending to be some kind of war hero for a bit of foreign policy propaganda for Sun readers to lap up. Prince Andrew who takes helicopters to and from golf days at tax payers expense, then pops over to see his peadophile best friend in America at our expense for pool parties with hookers. Prince Charles who drove his ex wife to anorexia, cheated on her while she was pregnant with both his children then possibly had her knocked off when she got pregnant with a muslim's baby. Lets not even start on Sarah Ferguson and her "TV career" !

    Do these people make you proud? Do you really in all honesty want these people to represent us on an international basis? Out of a misguided sense of tradition? Really?
     
  3. Siney

    Siney Guest

    Woahh i only made this thread about how off key everyone was in the arena, i didn't expect it to turn into a bin fest about the royal family.
     
  4. JonnyBGoode

    JonnyBGoode Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,118
    1
    Sep 30, 2011
    Sorry mate, I hold my hands up, my fault!

    It's just impossible to have a discussion about our national anthem without the topic coming up.

    I want to be proud and sing the national anthem but I can't be because I don't believe in having an un-elected monarchy. It's all the patriotic swear allegiance to your Queen **** that just doesn't sit well with me, as for the tuning of the anthem, I think it's fair to say that the Froch fans present won't be troubling the three tenors anytime soon!
     
  5. WinstonBarry

    WinstonBarry Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    1
    Aug 12, 2012
    Send in the clowns :roll:

    Don't try too hard to be oh so funny.
     
  6. WinstonBarry

    WinstonBarry Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    1
    Aug 12, 2012
    Christ, if it bothers you that much just emigrate. There's more important things to be worried about than whether you get to cast a meaningless vote on who's Head of State.
     
  7. JonnyBGoode

    JonnyBGoode Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,118
    1
    Sep 30, 2011
    Thanks for that, I'll leave the country immediately, I'm embarrassed for having an opinion on how my taxes are spent. I'll stick to worrying about more important matters now you've made me see the light. If everyone was as stoic as yourself about political issues and injustices the world would definitely be a much better place. Well done. :good
     
  8. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009

    Superb logic. Not feeling the weather today. Suppose I should emigrate.
     
  9. WinstonBarry

    WinstonBarry Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    1
    Aug 12, 2012
    Taxes? If it bothers you that much I'd have thought you'd at least have half a clue about what you're talking about. The revenue from the Crown Estate is escheated in the Exchequer; the whole purpose of the Civil List was that it was a substitute from the revenue normally generated from Crown possessions. You pay for nothing, though, the Royal Family probably help fund your tax credits.

    Try and worry about something a lil more serious. If you liken the Monarchy to an 'injustice' then I'd be so bold as to say that your moral compass is a little skewed.
     
  10. WinstonBarry

    WinstonBarry Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    1
    Aug 12, 2012
    It is, isn't it. I surprise myself sometimes.

    If something emotionally bothers you that much, then try and extricate yourself from it :good
     
  11. JonnyBGoode

    JonnyBGoode Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,118
    1
    Sep 30, 2011
    I could say the same I'm afraid as your information is inaccurate and out of date. The Civil List was abolished in 2011. 15% of the revenue of the Crown Estate goes directly to the monarchs, that's land that they don't own for which they receive an income and they've only been paying tax on that income for a decade. It's hardly any different from the old feudal system.

    If you think it's morally right that we have a "royal family" that lives a lavish lifestyle whilst also having 4 million people living below the poverty line then I'd examine your own moral compass a little bit more closely before pointing the finger at mine.

    In any case, it doesn't really bother me on a day to day basis, if I let my perceived injustices get to me regularly I'd be a very angry man, doesn't mean I can't have a discussion about them though.
     
  12. WinstonBarry

    WinstonBarry Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    1
    Aug 12, 2012
    Wow, you've piqued my interest so I just looked it up - looks like the Civil List is redundant from 2013 with a p/c of Crown Estate revenue being rebated to the Royal Family. Exactly the same principle as before.

    Actually, they do own the land :roll: and they haven't actually been receiving an income from it because it was escheated, previously, to the Exchequer.

    I think it's amoral, as do most people with a brain.
     
  13. JonnyBGoode

    JonnyBGoode Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,118
    1
    Sep 30, 2011
    I've just realised you're the same guy that trolled the Fury thread with all your anti Irish nonsense so I'm not going to bother debating with you as you're clearly a nationalistic troll with some bizarre chip on their shoulder.

    Either your mother gave you too much love or not enough love as a child, I'm not quite sure which one.

    The fact that it took you two hours to respond despite being online for the whole time shows that you've been frantically googling to try and find something of substance to continue this pointless argument. I'm sure there are loads of EDL websites and BNP forums where you can post your rhetoric among friends so I suggest you pop over there instead of taking up space here.
     
  14. WinstonBarry

    WinstonBarry Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    1
    Aug 12, 2012
    :|:|:|

    Go away then.

    No it shows I've got work to do rather than studiously awaiting your insipid and vapid insights into the Monarchy. :good
     
  15. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    Back to the music,then,Siney.The time before that I heard that song it was being sung in Doncaster by an attractive Sheffield bird in an accent that was straight from deepest Alabammy.Cant knock it cos Joe Cocker made a fortune out of doing the same thing,minus the anthem.