Gold standard for a competitive title reign?

Agreed- He really was the zenith. Others have beat better competition P4P in title reigns the thing with Louis was that he fought for so long in a dominant fashion and faced every guy in his division from his own and next generation.

 

Richard, yes I agree it's the promoters and managers that make the matches (ducking is referred) for bigger gates and protecting their golden goose. Mike Jacobs was in complete control of who fights who in New York venues , and all fighters were under contract. For the most part he selected (cherry picking) the fighters to be matched with his Champions. On some occasions he made mistakes and his Champions were proven not all that, against an underdog that made him **** in his pants, leaving his Champions damaged goods, and only to get robbed in NY.

 

Interesting question.
Ali's resume at HW just comes to mind, championship reign or not, though he had good reigns. He fought Frazier X3, Foreman, NortonX3, ListonX2, QuarryX2, Young, Lyle, Shavers, BugnerX2, CooperX2, the guy had star quality, went all over the world, took on all-comers, kept up a busy active schedule as heavyweight champ against good contenders when younger and again into his mid-thirties and won the title for the 3rd time from Spinks in a rematch who'd beaten him. I don't think he avoided many credible opponents. Ali was the first name to sprang to mind for me.

 

So true, my Dad used to tell me stories about Mike Jacobs and Madison Square Garden.

 

a truly earned Title to begin with,
a Legit Title,

HONEST Defences - Twice a Year and Against the REAL TOP Contender(s), not bypassed lower class fighters, or worse paid PLACED Rating for a fighter(s), for Bogus Championship fights...

do that for at least 2-3 years, does a Great Make.

 

Victor Valle trainer of Cooney's was a very good fighter, and personally knew him. Mike Jacobs and the NYSBC protected his Champions, I'll tell you more about later.

 

I agree, but that's not the way it worked in NY. in the 1930's and 40's and probably all the decades. Being too good of a fighter, than the Champions, is by passed / avoided at all cost.

 

Oh I know, we're very close too it as a family...

I often wondered, what an interesting Book it would be to write, "Boxing, the Alternative History..."

a Book about ALL the Great Contenders, Feared Fighters and Blatantly Cheated Boxers through ever Decade. It would be a Great and Interesting Book and it would throw up the Names of a Dozen or two of TOP Fighters from every decade who could have well won a World Title - GIVEN The Chance.

it would take some amount of work though, but it would be a great edition to Boxing History

 

I never even of thought of it. A real mind opener, that deserves, to make known of the fighters that would have been Champions, if given the chance. I have verified information on this very subject.

 

Joe Louis is the answer. 25 title defenses still the most any division and faced all top fighters over 11 plus years.

 

And technically Joe Louis retired as World Heavyweight Champion on March 1 1949, he made that ill fated comeback on Sept 27 1950, lost to champion Ezzard Charles by a 15 round decision, then to upcoming contender Rocky Marciano on Oct 26 1951, TKO 8. Joe owed the IRS a total of $ 90,000.00 in back taxes. The reason for his comeback.

 

what sort of info is that Ron?
if you care to say.

 

Joe Louis is indeed the gold standard.

In more recent era's with multiple titles on the go i thought Marvin Hagler did an extremely good job too.