Golden Boy moves towards Canelo vs O'Sullivan next.

Everything to do with it as we were talking about how it is that we can always predict that there will always be some awful judging in Canelos fights,Teddy Atlas said the same thing.

Canelo gets such a one sided schooling of Floyd,no shame in that as he was young and green but even then one judge gave it a draw so basically he can lose badly and still he will get bailed out.
You like Canelo I get that but I’ll never understand how you can like how they score his fights as it’s everything wrong with boxing and yes I’d say the same were it happening to Golovkin.

 

Boooolsheeeeet. LOL

Don't make me do a step by step recap, you'll only be embarrassed.

 

Canelo would get a win on the toilet and you know it

 

It wasnt officially an exhibition fight, but it may as well been.

 

Canelo can't help it if some judges like the cut of his jib.

 

Maybe so and I wouldn’t put that on his toes but there’s something drastically wrong if nobody can fight him and expect to win on points.i say this as someone who had him beating Lara and Trout(never got how some think Lara won)so it’s not like you can level that hater thing on me but I do hate to see scorecards that go against everything we can see,as boxing isn’t that difficult to score so whilst Canelo can’t help it,his team surely can and if they prove to be inept then get someone in who can score right.

I’m guessing even yourself never had him near to drawing with Floyd right?

 

Canelo was nowhere close to winning the Floyd fight IMO but bad cards are endemic of boxing not necessarily Canelo fights.

If you really want to get into it, He's only had one unforgivable card in his favor and that was the Byrd scorecard vs GGG. The CJ Ross card in the Floyd fight was way off IMO but forgivable knowing Floyd's style.

The haters will point to the Lara and Trout fights, some have even complained about the Cotto scorecards, but those are really just biased haters.

So when it comes down to it, too much hysterics over one, read 'em, ONE horrible card in a 52 fight career.

Can I get an AMEN!

 

The myth that the scorecards are always biased in Canelo's favor is just that, a myth.

 

Lol no you bloody can’t as Floyd was aggressive and in any case you’d have to be an awful judge to put out a duff score based on his style lol.
I know he beat Trout and Lara and Cotto but still we have the same duff card,I’m hoping we’ve seen the last as I don’t think they’ll dare stuff GGG again.

 

So 9 rounds to 3 vs Lara, 11 to 1 vs Cotto, 10 to 2 vs Trout and 4 to 1 vs Khan before the 6th round KO are reasonable reflections of what happened inside the ring according to you?!
I don't know how much of a Alvarez fan you have to be, and how thick red, white and green tinted glasses you'd have to wear to believe those are even kinda legit scorecards, but it's very hard to take you seriously after that statement.

 

I don't think anyone is arguing those scores accurately reflected what happened in the ring. Most people including Alvarez fans I think would agree that those were closer.

But here's my question to you : Are those any worse than a judge having Mayweather Berto 12 rounds to 0? Or a judge having Mayweather Pacquiao 10 rounds to 2? Or a judge having Mayweather Cotto 10 rounds to 2? Or a judge having SRL over Hagler 10 rounds to 2? Or a judge giving 4 rounds to SRL vs Norris?

 

No, those are all horrible scorecards, that you can't possibly defend.
But @ElCyclon is litterally claiming that Canelo only had 2 bad scorecards and everyone b_tching about other ones are haters, because they were perfectly legit somehow. While Canelo had 6 very bad scorecards (even more actually) in his favor in his last 10 fights, while in the other 4 he actually basically won every round, so they couldn't even be scored badly.

 

You're hopeless bro.