Golden Boy taking the rest of ESPN's 2009 Dates?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by coryr, Feb 24, 2009.


  1. coryr

    coryr New Member Full Member

    34
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    Btalk.com is reporting that Golden Boy is close to a sponsorship deal with Tecate and a partnership with ESPN that would include Golden Boy Promotions taking over every ESPN date for the rest of the year starting in late April.

    This would be HORRIBLE for boxing. Thoughts?
     
  2. boxingwizard

    boxingwizard Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,853
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Golden Boy would have some good shows, but there needs to be more diversity of promotions for the channel.
     
  3. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    I don't think it would be "horrible", Golden Boy would likely put on some very good cards, but like boxingwizad said, there should be more diversity in a weekly boxing show like FNF.... but if ESPN is having trouble getting name fighters to book fights, then I'm all for Golden Boy taking over.
     
  4. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    So no more Cuban fighters? Gamboa and company are all under Arena Box promotions.
     
  5. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    ESPN is all right. Looking forward to better fights.
     
  6. coryr

    coryr New Member Full Member

    34
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    Look what happened to Versus when Top Rank had an exclusive deal......It became a place for Tye Fields to get built up........Nobody can be sure that the ESPN shows under the Golden Boy banner would be any better. What have they done on their PPV undercards that would lead you to believe that this is going to be an upgrade?
     
  7. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    That doesn't mean that Golden Boy wouldn't co-promote events on ESPN either. Also, one thing about Golden Boy is that their fighters aren't blown up with easy fights. They really put their guys in there against tough competition.
     
  8. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004

    abner mares :yep
     
  9. wholesomefolsom

    wholesomefolsom New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    Some of GB's recent PPV undercards have been dreadful. I like the comparison to the Top Rank and Vs. agreement. There were some terrible cards during that spell and we had to watch Tye Fields get built up for an eventual ko at the hands of Monte Barrett.

    I'm not too thrilled with this idea.
     
  10. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    I don't care...Im gonna go to the Peter-Chambers FNF in March...should be great....gonna bring a sign:"WHO NEX!"
     
  11. rumour24tiger

    rumour24tiger Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,718
    2
    Jan 27, 2006
    There needs to be competition between promoters. As someone said abov,e give it to one promoter and they will just make safe matches. The promoters should all have to try their best to impress the broadcaster.

    GBP have done a crap job of developing prospects. Who has heard of Danny Jacobs, Danny Garcia, Victor Ortiz, Abner Mares? Those PPV undercards etc are anonymous affairs. GBP have mostly promoted big fights involving GBP partners; but can they develop young talent? If they're being given free reign, we will see. ESPN should be careful because the Top Rank/Versus thing was a load of rubbish. Too cozy for the promoter who doesn't have to impress.