Golovkin: “Saunders is not a serious opponent, Rolls was the best available for June”

Shadow is beyond help. He celebrates obvious bias so long as it helps his favourite fighter. It's pathetic.

Watching him move his narrative away from 'it could of gone either way' to Canelo dominating the fights just shows what a mealy mouthed weasel he is.

 

I didn't state that Canelo dominated either fight, nor have I changed my narrative. Both fights were close, however there was a clear winner in each fight and his name is Canelo Alvarez. Since the rematch occurred, I've made it very clear that I was more impressed with Canelo's performance in the first bout than I was with his performance in the rematch and I thought he won the first bout by a wider margin. I had the first bout about 8 rounds to 4 while I had the rematch a closer 7 to 5.

The first encounter was more of a schooling in that Canelo used his footwork and a more wide variety of rarely seen boxing skills to deal with GGG's aggression. In the rematch it was just a come forward approach, in which he beat GGG at his own game, giving GGG and many fans what they asked for which resulted in GGG going into retreat jabbing mode, but how he out classed GGG the first time around was more impressive to me. For you to misrepresent what I've been saying and act like I've changed my narrative is uncalled for. I've maintained a very consistent and logical view of both bouts.

 

This everyone is a man who just had the audacity to tell me he didn't say Canelo dominated Golovkin.

He just can't stop gobbling those ginger nuts.

 

You've got no shame man. Absolutely no shame.

You've adopted an increasingly warped rhetoric the more time has passed and you know it.

It would take about half and hours worth of digging to completely expose you on this and whilst I can't be bothered at the minute keep it up and I or someone else tired of reading your BS will.

 

You must have really poor reading comprehension, as nowhere in that quote did I suggest that Canelo dominated GGG. I specifically said GGG gave away the early rounds and didn't get started till the 5th round. There's no way you can argue that G won any of the first 4 rounds clearly. Now you could say he did a little better in the 4th, made it close, and what happend all 3 judges gave him that round. Two judges rescused GGG and allowed him to retain his title by giving GGG close rounds, rounds that he didn't really deserve. (like round 4) This is on point because those that argued GGG won acted like rounds like 4 and 5 were clear GGG rounds. They weren't. What makes what you're saying so absurd is the fact that I've always been respectful and understanding to those that gave GGG these rounds and had GGG winning the fight. That's why I've always said it was a close fight that could go either way. That's me being respectful to others who seen it differently, but that doesn't change who landed the cleaner shots in these swing rounds and who deserved to win them. And frankly if you can't debate these rounds or the fight on the basis of what happened in the rounds, and have to resort to trying to mischaracterizing what I've been saying, that says a lot about you and how desperate you are.

 

No amount of digging through my posts will expose me as anything other than being consistent, respectful to others and clear as to why I had Canelo winning. You're terribly off-track and the picture you are trying to paint about me is making you look extremely foolish !

 

It's there in black and white. You talk about how Canelo was 'robbed', say he 'schooled' 'outboxed' 'outclassed' 'outskilled' and a load of other BS.

You're not fooling anyone with your pathetic denials here.

 

Your problem is you lack attention to detail. I said "if anyone was robbed it was Canelo". That's different than saying "Canelo was robbed". I never claimed it was a robbery, unlike GGG fans who constantly cry robbery, as I recognized it was close and that regardless of the result there was a definite need for a rematch. On several occassions the constant cries of robbery from GGG fans have prompted me to break down what a robbery is. This is where you're getting stuck at. I pointed out that the draw allowed GGG to keep his titles so in effect he wasn't robbed of anything. I also pointed out that Canelo was very deserving of victory himself which is a point that is obviously lost on many posters.

There's a clear lack of appreciation for the eye catching clean work Canelo landed in that first bout. Many simply gave GGG rounds because he was coming forward, throwing more punches etc.

I did say GGG was schooled, outboxed out classed out skilled in the first bout, not to mention out body punched, out counter punched. All those things are true, and NONE of those things make it a domination as you claimed.

 

You know you're seen as one of the forums biggest jokes right? You can claim to be whatever you want but it really doesn't make it anymore true than it actually is.

Another long sad set of denials that convince noone. Just accept you're a Canelo knob gobbler pushing a pro Canelo agenda in spite of what everyone can see and move on.

 

I'm seen as a joke by whom ? By delusional GGG posters who think GGG won both fights over Canelo? Say what you want about me, but I'm always respectful of anyone who wants to debate results. There's plenty of posters who had GGG winning who I respect and have had worthwhile debates with.

You've made false accusations and misrespentations about me. I responded to each of your erroneous points in an attempt to set you straight so you can see how off-track you were. If you can't see the error in you ways after that response then there's probably no hope for you.

 

The irony in being told there is no hope for me from a man so one eyed for a fighter has genuinely made me laugh.

You can't see the wood for the trees.

 

A simple "I'm sorry" would be a good way for you to start redeeming yourself.

 

Lol. Not a chance an agenda driven flag waving moron gets an apology from me for calling you out on your nonsense.

You should apologise to the entire board for boring us all to tears with your inane fan boy propaganda.

 

Your attempts to dumb down and misrepresent what I posted has failed miserably. I'm the furthest thing from a fan boy possible. I pride myself on being as unbiased as possible. You're obviously incredibly lost as a poster and have resorted to feeble attempts to attack my integrity. You swooped in here out of nowhere and started to bad mouth me and call me out. That's on you, I countered every one of your claims, exposing you as a severely misguided poster.

 

If we were to ask the board who the biggest fan boys were on this site your name would be very near the top of the list.

That's the reality Shadow.