Golovkin: “Saunders is not a serious opponent, Rolls was the best available for June”

Grow up.

 

Is that the weight of reality crashing down on you?

 

The reality is that Canelo Alvarez beat GGG and is the Unified Middleweight Champion. Are you fighting that reality ? Or do you accept that ?

 

Don't get bent out of shape because you've just had a mirror held up and realised you had a rabid fanboy staring back at you.

Surely you must have known deep down that is how you're viewed on here. I can't believe it was a total surprise.

 

Lol

 

Are u trolling? The biggest fan boys on this site are by far GGG fans. It’s not even close!

 

No, you've just been duped by the fake 3G fans here....

 

Golovkin has a few rabid fan boys on here for sure but Shadow's relentless Canelo dickriding is just as bad.

 

I don’t care either way just saying what I see

 

Nothing wrong with Shadow. I just see him state that Canelo won and gives details as to why. I dont know why you such a big problem with that. I don’t see him creating threads claiming Canelo can beat all the past great middleweights like I see from 3G fans.

 

OK mate. One guy doesn't see him as a massive cinnamon swallower, good for you. He's a running joke for most with his continual defence of all things Canelo in long rambling posts attempting to defend all of kinds of shenanigans.

His especially pathetic calling out of people who refer to Clen as a steroid rather than a performance enhancing drug is especially weak.

 

"relentless Canelo ****riding" ? LOL you must be a severely butt hurt GGG fan.

 

You've made a joke out of yourself. If you've been paying any attention I haven't defended Canelo. I just call people out on their BS and set the record striaght. Like when somebody calls clenbuterol a steroid which it cleraly isn't. How is that weak, it's a fact jack. Instead of coming at me for correcting somebody who had it wrong, you should have backed me up and went at the person who mis-defined what a steroid is. That would show you aren't an insecure raging GGG fanatic but we know that's the case.

Also your attempt to speak for the entire board is humorous. You're just not seeing things clearly. What you think doesn't translate to what the rest of the board thinks. You need to get your head out of your posterior and start making attempts to redeem yourself from this epic fail of an attempt to come at me. You've made a mockery of your self and this board. An apology for trying to misrepresent me unprovoked would be appreciated. This is a very embarrassing chapter in your life. Correct your poor behavior ASAP.

 

You wish that was the case. Unfortunately most people aren't hopelessly committed to the successes of strangers so I couldn't give a **** about Golovkin's success or lack thereof. In fact if the Rolls fight backfires as a cherry pick gone wrong I'll laugh my ass off because I'm a fan of boxing not a boxer.

 

How is it weak? Haha - wow, you acting like you've delivered some piping hot comeback when what you're actually saying is 'actually my hero cheated using a substance defined differently'.

And your name comes up as punchline often enough for me to laugh at it. That's hardly 'talking for everyone'. Keep schlurping the Canelo-aid.