Golovkin and Cotto are going to fight.... in court!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abuffy, Nov 19, 2015.


  1. Chango

    Chango Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,594
    5
    Nov 14, 2009
    Why they couldn't wait?
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    If the WBC was honorable, they'd declare the title vacant and let the #1 and #2 contenders fight for it, Canelo was neither that and the only reason they're letting the title be at stake for Canelo is because the greedy ****s want a chunk of Canelo's multi-million dollar purse for it.
     
  3. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    So if you're stripped of the title... There is no point to paying GGG now is there? He's not stepping aside anymore? The Canelo fight isn't GGG's bizness anymore is it? The step aside deal was "contingent" on the WBC belts and order. With WBC stripping Cotto, it seems to me at least that the contingencies are stripped along with it.
     
  4. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,715
    9,943
    Jan 27, 2014
    lol I think you may have eaten too much poutine.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,550
    16,049
    Jul 19, 2004
    :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  6. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009

    It's not a title fight for Cotto anymore is it? They've stripped Cotto so whatever there was before is no more now. Thus there is no point to the step aside deal with GGG. Deals are ongoing and contingent.

     
  7. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    WBC=GREED

    If Cotto is no longer defending the middleweight title, why is the WBC going to hand Canelo over the middleweight championship if he beats Cotto who no longer is the WBC middleweight champion????????????????

    Canelo is no longer fighting the Champion but he'll get handed the WBC title belt if he beats non-champion Miguel Cotto!

    How do you explain that?

    I'll tell you how you explain it.
    If the WBC did the honorable thing, they'd let Golovkin fight for their title belt against the #2 contender.
    That scenario however gets the WBC a pittance of a sanctioning fee in comparison to the 3% they'd get from Canelo's multi-million dollar fight purse.

    If Canelo was a run of the mill fighter with peanuts for a fight purse, believe me, the WBC middleweight title would not be at stake for him on Saturday night with Cotto already being stripped.
     
  8. Chango

    Chango Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,594
    5
    Nov 14, 2009
    Wouldn't have been more honorable if GGG refused the money and told Cotto is not about the money but glory. But he sold his soul to Cotto by taking the money.
     
  9. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    +This
     
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,550
    16,049
    Jul 19, 2004
    Oh, I was including myself in the congregation. :lol:

    I'm not a lawyer, I've never seen the contracts, and even if I did see them, I doubt I could be arrsed to read them, and if I did, I doubt I'd understand the legal nuances of what I was reading.

    All of that said, basically...

    If Cotto signed a legally binding contract that he has to pay, I'm sure he'll ultimately have to, one way or another, court involvement or not. If he didn't sign a legally binding contract, than I expect the opposite outcome with the same qualifiers.

    But I am beginning to wonder if GGG wasn't played by Cotto, the WBC, and Canelo.

    :smoke
     
  11. 4themind

    4themind Member Full Member

    193
    7
    Jan 27, 2007
    As to why golovkin wasn't paid yet if there was a written agreement, what if said agreement hypothetically said that the money would be paid from Cotto's purse, just as sanction fees often are? In that case, the money would be likely only be disbursed after the fight.

    Such arrangements would make sense, because if for some reason the fight is postponed or cancelled, the step-aside-payer wouldn't be on the hook regardless. The winner of a hypothetical court case will likely hinge upon whatever written terms there were for this thing, which is not public knowledge as far as I know.
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,550
    16,049
    Jul 19, 2004
    Quality!

    :smoke
     
  13. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    :nod
     
  14. Just Rik

    Just Rik Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,786
    8
    Jul 21, 2013
    :lol: I should've known..

    And I wonder the same on the bolded, you can't past anything past the WBC..
     
  15. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    :deal